Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add griffinwork40/agent-afk --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griffinwork40/agent-afkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/griffinwork40/agent-afk/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/griffinwork40/agent-afk/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/griffinwork40/agent-afk/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/griffinwork40/agent-afk/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/griffinwork40/agent-afk/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.08227 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.03291 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.01645 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00823 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 201 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Read-only — hard constraint
This skill analyzes and reports; it never mutates the repository, the PR/MR, or anything external. After you emit the merge recommendation, STOP -- unless the Merge offer conditions (below) are met.
Never — not for a real bug, not for a blocking defect, not even when there is no human reviewer and "someone has to fix it":
- edit, create, or delete files (no
write/edit-style mutations); git add/commit/stash/reset,git checkoutto discard changes, orgit push;gh pr comment/review/edit/merge/create, or post or edit any PR/MR body, comment, or description;
Exception: gh pr merge is permitted after a MERGE verdict on a PR review in-which the findings are docs/test-related only, but only after the user explicitly confirms via ask_question (see Merge offer below).
- run any other write- or network-mutating shell command.
The only shell permitted is read-only inspection: git diff / git show / gh pr diff / gh repo view, grep / rg, and file reads — plus dispatching the review sub-agents. Resolving findings, fixing bugs, resolving merge conflicts, and "making the branch mergeable" are explicitly out of scope: a fixable defect is a finding to report (file:line + a one-line fix in the suggestion field), never a license to act.
Sub-agent contract
/contract
Skip for: lock files (package-lock.json, go.sum, yarn.lock), auto-generated files (*.generated.*), pure-docs diffs, vendored deps.
Resolve target → diff (inline). The review target argument is: $ARGUMENT (empty = review working-tree/HEAD changes). Map this argument to a diff source, then capture the diff text plus a one-line target descriptor for the triage header. Also capture the reviewed ref (branch HEAD SHA or equivalent) — this is required for citation verification later:
--staged→git diff --staged; reviewed ref =git write-tree(snapshots the staged index to a throwaway tree so citations resolve against the staged content under review, not HEAD)--heador no arg →git diff HEAD; reviewed ref =git stash create(snapshots worktree + index to a throwaway commit so citations resolve against the content under review; empty output = no local changes → fall back togit rev-parse HEAD)- arg matches
^https?://.*/pull/\d+(GitHub/GitLab PR URL) →gh pr diff <url>(orglab mr diff); reviewed ref = head SHA fromgh pr view <url> --json headRefOid -q .headRefOid; record PR title + base/head refs - arg matches
^#?\d+$(bare PR number, optionally#-prefixed) → resolve in current repo withgh pr diff <n>; reviewed ref = head SHA fromgh pr view <n> --json headRefOid -q .headRefOid; ifghis unavailable or repo has no PR matching, abort withAsking(one question: which repo/PR) - arg matches
^[0-9a-f]{7,40}$(commit SHA) →git show <sha>; reviewed ref =<sha> - arg matches a known ref (
git rev-parse --verify <arg>succeeds) →git diff <merge-base>...<arg>against the repo's default branch; reviewed ref =git rev-parse <arg> - arg is a path or
*.diff/*.patchfile → read file contents as the diff; reviewed ref =unknown (patch file — no live ref available) - otherwise → abort with
Askingnaming the ambiguous arg
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 9ba6d2f1d7b2
- 1mo ago Changed d370edb1f95a
- 1mo ago Changed ebf930c14958
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 3b4595d76451
- 1mo ago Changed · +26 lines 422f7925e169
- 2mo ago First seen · 172 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A a669d27cb892
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository griffinwork40/agent-afk (63 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 8,227 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reviewgriffinwork40/agent-afk | Skill | 63 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 100 | Claude Code |
| hunk-launch-videomodem-dev/hunk | Skill | 9.8k | yesterday | MIT | A | 60 | Claude Code, Codex |
| hunk-releasemodem-dev/hunk | Skill | 9.8k | yesterday | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code, Codex |
| md-auditchaitanyagiri/munder-difflin | Skill | 9.4k | today | MIT | A | 85 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewdamianvtran/local-operator | Skill | 229 | today | MIT | A | 45 | Claude Code, Codex |
| responding-to-reviewdamianvtran/local-operator | Skill | 229 | today | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code, Codex |
| apply-qa-fixesSynkraAI/aiox-core | Skill | 3.1k | today | none | A | 48 | Claude Code |