Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add griffinwork40/agent-framework --skill refactorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griffinwork40/agent-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/griffinwork40/agent-framework/refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/griffinwork40/agent-framework/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/griffinwork40/agent-framework/refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/griffinwork40/agent-framework/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/griffinwork40/agent-framework/refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.01990 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.00796 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00398 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00199 |
Grade A, and why
refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 19d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to refactor — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 157 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sub-agent contract
/contract
Skip when: the change touches ≤3 files and no dependency ordering is required — just edit directly. Also skip when the codebase has no test coverage at all (behavioral preservation cannot be verified; ask the user to add tests first or proceed manually).
Triage (inline, before dispatching any sub-agent)
Parse $ARGUMENT to extract:
- Change type: rename | api-migration | pattern-standardization | layer-restructure | dependency-upgrade | other
- Target symbol / path / pattern (what is changing)
- Destination (what it becomes)
- Scope: default to the entire repo; narrow if
--scopeis provided
If $ARGUMENT is ambiguous on any of the above, stop and ask exactly one question.
Wave 1 — Scope enumeration (parallel, subagent_type: "research-agent")
Dispatch both agents simultaneously in a single response turn.
Site-finder agent
- goal: Enumerate every file and symbol that must change for the refactor to be complete and correct.
- inputs: change type, target symbol/pattern, scope glob
- artifacts:
sites: array of{file, line_range, site_type: "definition"|"import"|"usage"|"type-ref"|"test", change_required: string}dependency_graph: for each site, which other sites must be changed first (a site depends on its callers if it exports a symbol; a definition must be changed before its imports)site_count: integerconfidence: low | medium | highcoverage_gaps: what the agent couldn't search (generated files, third-party vendored code, etc.)
- non_goals: Do not apply any changes. Do not read unrelated files.
- failure_modes: If grep tooling is unavailable, return
confidence: lowand list what was searched manually.
Contract-extractor agent
- goal: Identify the public interfaces and test commands that verify behavioral preservation for the affected API surface.
- inputs: site list (from site-finder, passed inline if available; if not yet available, derive from change type + scope)
- artifacts:
contracts: array of{symbol, signature_before, exported_by, consumed_by[]}test_commands: array of shell commands that SCOPE to the affected contracts — target the specific test files or a name pattern, never the whole suite (e.g.,pnpm test src/auth/auth-service.test.tsorpnpm test -t "AuthService"). Under pnpm,pnpm test -- <file>drops the file arg and runs the entire suite — never emit that form.test_coverage_verdict: "adequate" | "partial" | "absent"confidence: low | medium | highcoverage_gaps: test paths not reachable by the identified commands
- non_goals: Do not run tests. Do not read unrelated files.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 19d ago Changed · +1 lines 816bcc71c185
- 1mo ago First seen · 156 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A 3adf801b9a61
refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository griffinwork40/agent-framework (23 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 1,990 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to refactor, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Optimize the meaningful UI available immediately from a Next.js route on an initial load (hard navigation) or named client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route and entry point at a time; the shipped test then guards…