refactor

A workflow for making broad, organized structural changes across a codebase. It finds all affected uses, orders dependent changes, applies them in isolated work areas, and checks the result.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for repository-wide symbol renames, API migrations, pattern standardization, layer restructuring, or dependency upgrades when several files and dependency relationships are involved.
Why use it?
It reduces the chance of missing references or changing dependent code in the wrong order during large refactors. Tests provide evidence that behavior was preserved.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/griffinwork40/agent-framework/refactor
Any agent
npx skills add griffinwork40/agent-framework --skill refactor
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griffinwork40/agent-framework

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 93 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,973 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 97% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00093 $0.01973
Opus 5 $0.00046 $0.00986
Sonnet 5 $0.00019 $0.00395
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00197

Measured 2d ago against content hash 3adf801b9a61, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

97% identical to refactor — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/refactor/SKILL.md · 156 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 156 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Sub-agent contract

/contract

Skip when: the change touches ≤3 files and no dependency ordering is required — just edit directly. Also skip when the codebase has no test coverage at all (behavioral preservation cannot be verified; ask the user to add tests first or proceed manually).


Triage (inline, before dispatching any sub-agent)

Parse $ARGUMENT to extract:

  • Change type: rename | api-migration | pattern-standardization | layer-restructure | dependency-upgrade | other
  • Target symbol / path / pattern (what is changing)
  • Destination (what it becomes)
  • Scope: default to the entire repo; narrow if --scope is provided

If $ARGUMENT is ambiguous on any of the above, stop and ask exactly one question.


Wave 1 — Scope enumeration (parallel, subagent_type: "research-agent")

Dispatch both agents simultaneously in a single response turn.

Site-finder agent

  • goal: Enumerate every file and symbol that must change for the refactor to be complete and correct.
  • inputs: change type, target symbol/pattern, scope glob
  • artifacts:
    • sites: array of {file, line_range, site_type: "definition"|"import"|"usage"|"type-ref"|"test", change_required: string}
    • dependency_graph: for each site, which other sites must be changed first (a site depends on its callers if it exports a symbol; a definition must be changed before its imports)
    • site_count: integer
    • confidence: low | medium | high
    • coverage_gaps: what the agent couldn't search (generated files, third-party vendored code, etc.)
  • non_goals: Do not apply any changes. Do not read unrelated files.
  • failure_modes: If grep tooling is unavailable, return confidence: low and list what was searched manually.

Contract-extractor agent

  • goal: Identify the public interfaces and test commands that verify behavioral preservation for the affected API surface.
  • inputs: site list (from site-finder, passed inline if available; if not yet available, derive from change type + scope)
  • artifacts:
    • contracts: array of {symbol, signature_before, exported_by, consumed_by[]}
    • test_commands: array of shell commands that SCOPE to the affected contracts — target the specific test files or a name pattern, never the whole suite (e.g., pnpm test src/auth/auth-service.test.ts or pnpm test -t "AuthService"). Under pnpm, pnpm test -- <file> drops the file arg and runs the entire suite — never emit that form.
    • test_coverage_verdict: "adequate" | "partial" | "absent"
    • confidence: low | medium | high
    • coverage_gaps: test paths not reachable by the identified commands
  • non_goals: Do not run tests. Do not read unrelated files.

Read the full file on GitHub · 156 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 156 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A 3adf801b9a61

Subscribe to this mod's changes

refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository griffinwork40/agent-framework (23 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 1,973 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to refactor, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens