Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/griffinwork40/agent-framework/refactornpx skills add griffinwork40/agent-framework --skill refactorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griffinwork40/agent-frameworkWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00093 | $0.01973 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00986 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00395 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00197 |
Grade A, and why
refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to refactor — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 156 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sub-agent contract
/contract
Skip when: the change touches ≤3 files and no dependency ordering is required — just edit directly. Also skip when the codebase has no test coverage at all (behavioral preservation cannot be verified; ask the user to add tests first or proceed manually).
Triage (inline, before dispatching any sub-agent)
Parse $ARGUMENT to extract:
- Change type: rename | api-migration | pattern-standardization | layer-restructure | dependency-upgrade | other
- Target symbol / path / pattern (what is changing)
- Destination (what it becomes)
- Scope: default to the entire repo; narrow if
--scopeis provided
If $ARGUMENT is ambiguous on any of the above, stop and ask exactly one question.
Wave 1 — Scope enumeration (parallel, subagent_type: "research-agent")
Dispatch both agents simultaneously in a single response turn.
Site-finder agent
- goal: Enumerate every file and symbol that must change for the refactor to be complete and correct.
- inputs: change type, target symbol/pattern, scope glob
- artifacts:
sites: array of{file, line_range, site_type: "definition"|"import"|"usage"|"type-ref"|"test", change_required: string}dependency_graph: for each site, which other sites must be changed first (a site depends on its callers if it exports a symbol; a definition must be changed before its imports)site_count: integerconfidence: low | medium | highcoverage_gaps: what the agent couldn't search (generated files, third-party vendored code, etc.)
- non_goals: Do not apply any changes. Do not read unrelated files.
- failure_modes: If grep tooling is unavailable, return
confidence: lowand list what was searched manually.
Contract-extractor agent
- goal: Identify the public interfaces and test commands that verify behavioral preservation for the affected API surface.
- inputs: site list (from site-finder, passed inline if available; if not yet available, derive from change type + scope)
- artifacts:
contracts: array of{symbol, signature_before, exported_by, consumed_by[]}test_commands: array of shell commands that SCOPE to the affected contracts — target the specific test files or a name pattern, never the whole suite (e.g.,pnpm test src/auth/auth-service.test.tsorpnpm test -t "AuthService"). Under pnpm,pnpm test -- <file>drops the file arg and runs the entire suite — never emit that form.test_coverage_verdict: "adequate" | "partial" | "absent"confidence: low | medium | highcoverage_gaps: test paths not reachable by the identified commands
- non_goals: Do not run tests. Do not read unrelated files.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 156 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A 3adf801b9a61
refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository griffinwork40/agent-framework (23 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 1,973 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to refactor, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…