engineering-standards

engineering-standards is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from groupzer0/vs-code-agents. It costs 45 tokens per session (1,026 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-quality guide based on common software design principles such as SOLID, DRY, YAGNI, and KISS. It includes patterns that may reveal overly complex code or technical debt, which means costly problems built up over time.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing code, planning architecture, finding technical debt, or deciding how to refactor classes, modules, conditionals, and dependencies.
Why use it?
It helps identify code that has too many responsibilities, repeated logic, unnecessary features, or difficult-to-change structures. It also suggests ways to split and simplify that code.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it when reviewing code, planning architecture, finding technical debt, or deciding how to refactor classes, modules, conditionals, and dependencies.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/groupzer0/vs-code-agents/engineering-standards
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add groupzer0/vs-code-agents --skill engineering-standards
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/groupzer0/vs-code-agents

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for engineering-standards

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/groupzer0/vs-code-agents/engineering-standards/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/groupzer0/vs-code-agents/engineering-standards)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/groupzer0/vs-code-agents/engineering-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/groupzer0/vs-code-agents/engineering-standards/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for engineering-standards

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/groupzer0/vs-code-agents/engineering-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/groupzer0/vs-code-agents/engineering-standards.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 45 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,026 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00045 $0.01026
Opus 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00410
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00205
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00103

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 17657f2e1be6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

engineering-standards scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

vs-code-agents/skills/engineering-standards/SKILL.md · 173 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 173 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Engineering Standards

Foundational principles for high-quality software. Use this skill when:

  • Reviewing code for quality issues
  • Planning architectural changes
  • Identifying refactoring opportunities
  • Evaluating technical debt

SOLID Principles

Single Responsibility (SRP)

A class/module should have one reason to change.

Detection patterns:

  • Class with 5+ public methods doing unrelated things
  • Method longer than 50 lines
  • Class name contains "And" or "Manager" with mixed concerns
  • File imports from 10+ unrelated modules

Refactoring:

  • Extract class for each responsibility
  • Split into focused modules
  • Use composition over inheritance

Open/Closed (OCP)

Open for extension, closed for modification.

Detection patterns:

  • Switch/case on type with frequent additions
  • if/else chains checking instance types
  • Modifying existing code to add new features

Refactoring:

  • Strategy pattern for varying behaviors
  • Plugin architecture for extensions
  • Dependency injection for configurability

Liskov Substitution (LSP)

Subtypes must be substitutable for their base types.

Detection patterns:

  • Override that throws "not implemented"
  • Subclass that ignores parent behavior
  • Type checks before calling inherited methods

Refactoring:

  • Favor composition over inheritance
  • Extract interface for true polymorphism
  • Use abstract base with required overrides

Interface Segregation (ISP)

Clients shouldn't depend on methods they don't use.

Detection patterns:

  • Interface with 10+ methods
  • Implementing classes that stub methods as no-ops
  • "Fat" interfaces with unrelated method groups

Refactoring:

  • Split into role-specific interfaces
  • Use mixins/traits for optional behaviors
  • Compose multiple focused interfaces

Dependency Inversion (DIP)

Depend on abstractions, not concretions.

Detection patterns:

  • Direct instantiation of dependencies (new ConcreteClass())
  • Hard-coded database/API connections
  • Test files creating production instances

Read the full file on GitHub · 173 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 173 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 17657f2e1be6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

engineering-standards is a skill published in the GitHub repository groupzer0/vs-code-agents (292 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,026 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens