Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gruberb/bulletproof-rust-web --skill review-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gruberb/bulletproof-rust-webWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gruberb/bulletproof-rust-web/review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gruberb/bulletproof-rust-web/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gruberb/bulletproof-rust-web/review-pr.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00479 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00239 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 49 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 537f53911acc
review-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository gruberb/bulletproof-rust-web (50 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 479 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review
Run a structured adversarial code review (critique → defense → rebuttal → verdict) with evidence-backed findings and stable IDs. Use when you want a thorough, multi-perspective review of code changes, a PR, or a design — produces actionable findings ranked by severity. NOT for writing or expanding tests (use testing)…
code-review
AI-powered code review and PR analysis. Performs systematic reviews covering security vulnerabilities, code quality, style compliance, architectural integrity, test coverage, and performance considerations. Works with PR diffs, commit ranges, file changes, or raw code snippets. Primary keyword clusters: AI code review…
review-system-design
Review a system design someone else provided - screenshot, drawio, Mermaid, slides, doc, or IaC - by extracting it into a confirmed fact sheet, then scoring it on the nine axes.
review-ticket
Review a ticket or PR through focused specialist lenses: scope, architecture, security, tests, AC coverage, and PR metadata.
common-feedback-reporter
Pre-write audit for skill violations: checks planned code against loaded skill anti-patterns before any file write. Use when writing Flutter/Dart/TS code or editing SKILL.md files with active project skills. Load as composite; on auto-fixed violation, also load +common/common-learning-log.
code-quality-principles
Applies KISS, YAGNI, and SOLID principles for clean code with reduced complexity. Use when refactoring or reviewing code for over-engineering.