Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/gsa-tts/agentic-coding-playbook/ato-packagenpx skills add GSA-TTS/agentic-coding-playbook --skill ato-packagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GSA-TTS/agentic-coding-playbookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gsa-tts/agentic-coding-playbook/ato-package)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gsa-tts/agentic-coding-playbook/ato-package"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gsa-tts/agentic-coding-playbook/ato-package.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.01549 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00775 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00310 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
ato-package scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ATO Package Assembly
This skill collects, validates, and indexes all Authority to Operate submission artifacts into a review-ready package for ISSO review.
When to Use
- Before submitting a system for ISSO review
- When preparing an ATO package for a new or updated system
- When asked "is the compliance package complete?"
- After completing risk assessment, pre-deployment checks, and decision records
Assembly Procedure
Step 1: Artifact Inventory
Check which required artifacts exist in the target repository:
-
AGENTS.md— behavioral contract defining agent permissions and constraints -
docs/risk-assessment.md— completed risk assessment (not the template) -
docs/adr/directory with at leastADR-001— architecture decision records -
checklists/pre-deployment.md— completed checklist with sign-off -
docs/CODING_PRACTICES.md— coding standards and practices -
SECURITY.md— vulnerability disclosure policy -
.github/workflows/— CI/CD pipeline definitions
For each artifact, record: exists (yes/no), last modified date, file size.
If an artifact is missing, note it as a gap and continue. Do not stop the assembly process for missing items — the gap analysis in Step 4 will capture them.
Step 2: Validate Artifacts
Run validators on each artifact that exists:
# Validate risk assessment structure and completeness
make validate-risk-assessment RISK_PATH=docs/risk-assessment.md
# Validate frontmatter, skills, and landscape references
make validate
# Run pre-deployment security checks
make pre-deploy
Record the pass/fail result of each validator. If a validator is not available in the target repo, note "validator not available" and flag for manual review.
For docs/risk-assessment.md, also verify:
- All sections are filled in (not placeholder text)
- Risk scores are calculated (Likelihood x Impact)
- Treatment plans exist for Medium (6+) and above risks
- Sign-off section has names and dates
For checklists/pre-deployment.md, also verify:
- All checklist items have a Pass/Fail/N/A status
- Failed items have remediation notes
- Sign-off block at the bottom is completed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 164 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A bd48650e0d43
ato-package is a skill published in the GitHub repository GSA-TTS/agentic-coding-playbook (23 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed CC0-1.0. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 1,549 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
Write the full patent specification from claims and invention disclosure. Use when user says "撰写说明书", "write specification", "写说明书", "patent description", or wants to draft the complete patent specification.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…