Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add gtapps/claude-code-hermit/plugin install claude-code-fitness-hermitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtapps/claude-code-hermit/fitness-brief)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtapps/claude-code-hermit/fitness-brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtapps/claude-code-hermit/fitness-brief/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtapps/claude-code-hermit/fitness-brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtapps/claude-code-hermit/fitness-brief.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00113 | $0.01754 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.00877 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00351 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
fitness-brief scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 117 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fitness Brief
One skill, two lenses on the same athlete's training state. Composition is intent-driven, not scripted: gather a bounded digest, then write the brief toward the goal below in the operator's configured voice — there is no fixed section order, no hardcoded tone, and no mandatory rest-day copy.
Flags
--morning: slotmorning. Forward-looking.--evening: slotevening. Backward-looking.--slot <name>: custom slot label; orientation defaults to forward-looking unless the operator's own conventions say otherwise.
Resolve <slot> from the flag before starting. Filenames below use that resolved value.
Steps below say "Morning"/"Evening" as shorthand for forward-looking/backward-looking
orientation — a custom --slot follows whichever branch matches its resolved orientation.
Steps
-
Connectivity + sync mechanics. These fold in what
strava-health-checkandstrava-syncused to run on their own crons — this brief now owns that beat.- Call
mcp__strava__check-strava-connection. If disconnected: say so plainly in the brief and skip the data-dependent parts below rather than fabricating figures. - Evening only: call
mcp__strava__get-recent-activities(perPage: 5), compare againststate/strava-last-activity-id.txt(treat missing as "none"), and for any new activity whose StravatypeisRun, invoke/claude-code-fitness-hermit:activity-deep-dive <id>(cap 3 — log skipped IDs to SHELL.md Progress Log past the cap). Advance the cursor file to the highest new ID. Hold the newest new activity's id/name/sport for step 4 — do not writestate/strava-pending-rpe.jsonhere. That file's writer contract (seedocs/knowledge-schema.mdandCLAUDE.md§ Memory Conventions) is write-only-after-confirmed-delivery, precisely so a failed or push-only send can't bind a future RPE reply to an activity the operator was never actually told about.
- Call
-
Gather (bounded). Raw Strava streams must never enter context —
fitness-lab.tsreduces them first.- Morning:
bun ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/fitness-lab.ts weekly-load— a rolling per-week load digest (km, moving time, zone %,tss_proxy). Readstate/strava-weekly-baselines.jsonif present for trend context. - Evening: if a new activity was found in step 1 and it was not a
Run(step 1 only deep-dives Run activities),bun ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/fitness-lab.ts analyze <the non-Run activity's id from step 1>for today's session — pass the id explicitly, notlatest:latestresolves the globally most-recent Strava activity, which on a mixed-type day (a Run uploaded after the non-Run) would analyze the wrong session. If the new activity was aRun, step 1'sactivity-deep-divecall already ran this same analysis and wrotecompiled/activity-<id>-<date>.md— read that artifact instead of re-running the analysis, which would redo the same Strava fetch and computation. Either way, also read whateverstate/activity-notes.jsonalready holds for it. No new activity is itself the input — there's nothing to analyze.
- Morning:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed 36d4a2136fb7
- 9d ago First seen · 117 lines · 113 tokens per session scan A 1f95bed78c81
fitness-brief is a skill published in the GitHub repository gtapps/claude-code-hermit (74 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 113 tokens to every session and 1,754 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cco-tools
Show what tools actually cost in tokens — learned per-tool averages from observed results, replacing the hardcoded MCP/Agent guesses.
github-pr-creation
Creates GitHub Pull Requests with automated validation and task tracking. Use when user wants to create PR, open pull request, submit for review, or check if ready for PR. Analyzes commits, validates task completion, generates Conventional Commits title and description, suggests labels. NOTE - for merging existing…
design-system-reference
Style guides and implementation rules for frontend design. Works with design-discovery agent which handles context gathering and VS-based style recommendations. Contains detailed style guides, anti-patterns, and implementation checklists.
magic-compact
Compact this Claude Code session.
boss-briefing
Vault health check — workflow pattern analysis, profile sync, session gap recovery, persona rule proposals.
subagent-output-templating
Template for structured sub-agent output including YAML log format, task completion reports (WHY/WHAT/TRADE-OFFS/RISKS), and summary constraints. Use when defining how sub-agents should report results.