plan-feature

A planning workflow that takes a defined software feature and creates its engineering plan and roadmap entry. A roadmap is the ordered list of planned project work.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to plan a designed feature, plan the next roadmap item, or create a specification and task phases. It writes planning documents but does not write code.
Why use it?
It separates deciding what a feature should do from deciding how to build it, so unfinished product ideas do not enter engineering planning.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Part of the agentic-workflow plugin — 35 skills shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/gtrabanco/agentic-workflow/plan-feature
Any agent
npx skills add gtrabanco/agentic-workflow --skill plan-feature
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gtrabanco/agentic-workflow

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install agentic-workflow, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 35 skills.

Per session 66 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,154 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00066 $0.02154
Opus 5 $0.00033 $0.01077
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00431
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00215

Measured 3d ago against content hash b7841e29ea25, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

plan-feature scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

packages/pi-agentic-workflow/skills/plan-feature/SKILL.md · 180 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 180 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Plan Feature (router)

The engineering-planning door for a feature whose product definition already exists. Routes to a focused internal step so only the work you need runs (no fat single skill). Docs only — no code, no branch. Product definition (raw-idea interview, capability closure) is design-feature's job, not this one — the routed redirect gate enforces that split.

Turn contract — verify before ending the turn

✓ The redirect gate ran FIRST, before any SPEC edit: undesigned input → STOP,
  print the fixed `/design-feature <slug>` block, do nothing else this turn
✓ Designed input only: engineering half filled, artifacts written, and the
  roadmap entry registered (number, order, deps verified)
✓ If `plan-feature-scaffold` ran this turn: the roadmap row was re-read
  AFTER the write and literally reads `planned` — a dropped `defined→planned`
  write fails this box; do not end the turn until it's fixed
✓ The dependency & blocker check was RUN and its result decides which closing block is printed
✓ An unmet dependency? The closing block lists the complete dependency chain, deepest first, joined with ` + `
✓ Artifact language: explicit user instruction > the project's declared docs language > English. The CONVERSATION language never decides — a Spanish prompt still produces English PRs/issues/commits/SPECs unless one of the first two says otherwise
✓ The closing `→ Next:` block is printed as the ABSOLUTE last output

About to end the turn with any box unchecked? The turn is NOT done — complete the missing box first (weak models drop end-of-document duties; this list is first on purpose).

Step 0 — Discover the project (always first)

Per the agent guide's Workflow conventions + documentation map, then read what THIS skill needs: the roadmap (docs/features/ROADMAP.md), so routing and roadmap registration match the project's real layout.

Progressive loading — route before planning

The reference allowlist is exactly the two paths below:

Read the full file on GitHub · 180 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 180 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A b7841e29ea25

Subscribe to this mod's changes

plan-feature is a skill published in the GitHub repository gtrabanco/agentic-workflow (20 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 2,154 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

think-like-me

Personal engineering rules and reasoning patterns the user has curated over time. Consult BEFORE writing, modifying, debugging, or designing any technical feature — rules often cover domain-specific gotchas (e.g., mobile audio timers need background mode) that generic answers miss. Also triggers on /learn-this, "learn…

kakha13/think-like-me · 88 tokens

offensive-crypto-attacks

Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and…

SnailSploit/Claude-Red · 261 tokens

offensive-mobile

Mobile (Android + iOS) application penetration testing methodology. Covers static analysis (apktool/jadx for Android, class-dump/Hopper/IDA for iOS), dynamic instrumentation with Frida and Objection, SSL pinning bypass strategies, root/jailbreak detection bypass, deep-link / URL-scheme abuse, exported component…

SnailSploit/Claude-Red · 185 tokens

offensive-parameter-pollution

HTTP parameter pollution (HPP) checklist: duplicate parameter injection, backend vs frontend parsing differences, WAF bypass via HPP, server-side vs client-side HPP, and practical exploitation patterns. Use when testing web applications for parameter handling flaws.

SnailSploit/Claude-Red · 0 tokens

sandbox-next

Use when building or changing Cloudflare Sandbox apps on @cloudflare/sandbox@next (Sandbox SDK 1.0 preview)—code execution, AI runners, interpreters, CI-like jobs, terminals, files, mounts, tunnels, preview URLs, lifecycle, or errors. Not for the default stable package (use sandbox-stable) or for porting stable to…

cloudflare/skills · 86 tokens

offensive-anti-forensics

Anti-forensics and evidence destruction techniques for red team operators conducting authorized engagements. Covers log clearing on Windows (wevtutil, Clear-EventLog, ETW provider patching) and Linux (journal truncation, utmp/wtmp binary editing, syslog manipulation), timestamp manipulation via Timestomp and SetMACE…

SnailSploit/Claude-Red · 243 tokens