Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gtrabanco/agentic-workflow --skill review-a11ygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gtrabanco/agentic-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtrabanco/agentic-workflow/review-a11y)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtrabanco/agentic-workflow/review-a11y"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtrabanco/agentic-workflow/review-a11y/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtrabanco/agentic-workflow/review-a11y"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtrabanco/agentic-workflow/review-a11y.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.00665 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00332 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00133 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
review-a11y scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 70 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Accessibility (internal)
Composed by review-change / product-audit within their conversation — on any
agent, follow this file inline as the routed step. Findings only; never edits,
never refactors.
Scope
The diff or path/glob the caller passes; default the current change vs the default branch. State the scope at the top of the returned table.
Checklist (evaluate EVERY item — none is optional; n/a must be stated)
✓ Semantic elements over generic ones (button not clickable div; headings in order; landmarks present) ✓ Every input has an associated label; every image an alt (empty alt only when decorative) ✓ Full keyboard operability of the changed surface (tab order, Enter/Space activation, Escape to dismiss) ✓ Focus management on dynamic changes (modals trap + restore focus; route changes move focus) ✓ Contrast of changed text/UI meets the project's declared level (default WCAG AA) — cite computed values where checkable ✓ ARIA used correctly and only when semantics can't do it (wrong ARIA is a major finding) ✓ No information conveyed by color alone ✓ Motion/animation respects reduced-motion preferences (n/a if no motion added) ✓ Error messages programmatically associated with their fields
Materiality bar
Report a row only when a competent user's outcome changes or a rule the project
explicitly declares is violated — cite the rule it violates beside the evidence.
Not findings: comment/punctuation typos, formatting-only drift, style preference
with no cited rule, hypothetical robustness beyond the SPEC's named scenarios.
An empty table with Decision: PASS is the expected result for a well-formed
change — never pad the table.
Return exactly
REVIEW ACCESSIBILITY — scope: <scope>
| # | Finding | Sev | Evidence | Suggested fix |
|---|---------|-----|----------|---------------|
| 1 | <what> | critical|major|minor | <file:line> | <smallest action> |
Checklist: <n> evaluated, <n> pass, <n> findings, <n> n/a (<which + why>)
Summary: <1-2 sentences>
Decision: PASS | FAIL
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · +9 lines 694114baa684
- 9d ago First seen · 61 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A 3fa498502cf7
review-a11y is a skill published in the GitHub repository gtrabanco/agentic-workflow (21 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 665 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-glyph
Create R-based pictogram glyphs for skill, agent, or team icons in the visualization layer. Covers concept sketching, ggplot2 layer composition using the primitives library, color strategy, registration in the appropriate glyph mapping file and manifest, rendering via the build pipeline, and visual verification of the…
design-cli-output
Design terminal output for a CLI tool with chalk colors, Unicode glyphs, multiple verbosity levels (human, verbose, quiet, JSON), and consistent voice rules. Covers color palette selection, status indicator design, reporter function architecture, ceremony/narrative output variants, and cross-terminal compatibility.…
create-2d-composition
Compose 2D graphics programmatically using SVG generation, diagram layout algorithms, image compositing, and batch processing workflows. Use when generating diagrams, flowcharts, or infographics programmatically, creating reproducible scientific figures, automating production of badges or visual assets, building…
create-3d-scene
Set up a Blender scene programmatically via Python (bpy) with objects, materials, lighting, camera, and environment configuration. Use when creating reproducible 3D visualization scenes, automating product or architectural rendering setup, generating multiple scene variations programmatically, building template scenes…
design-shiny-ui
Design Shiny application UIs using bslib for theming, layoutcolumns for responsive grids, value boxes, cards, and custom CSS/SCSS. Covers page layouts, accessibility, and brand consistency. Use when building a new Shiny app UI from scratch, modernizing an existing app from fluidPage to bslib, applying brand theming…
audit-icon-pipeline
Detect missing glyphs, icons, and HD variants by comparing registries against glyph mapping files, icon directories, and manifests. Reports gaps for skills, agents, and teams across all palettes.