Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/gtrabanco/agentic-workflow/workflow-statusnpx skills add gtrabanco/agentic-workflow --skill workflow-statusgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gtrabanco/agentic-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtrabanco/agentic-workflow/workflow-status)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtrabanco/agentic-workflow/workflow-status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtrabanco/agentic-workflow/workflow-status.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00057 | $0.01869 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00934 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00374 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00187 |
Grade A, and why
workflow-status scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Workflow Status (the orchestrator's sensor)
One read-only pass over the project that answers, in a single fixed JSON
envelope: what exists, what is blocked on what, what is startable right now,
and what the recommended next command is. Built for external orchestrators
(see docs/workflow/ORCHESTRATION.md) but equally useful to a human asking
"where do we stand?".
Turn contract — verify before ending the turn
✓ Every claim comes from a RUN command or a READ file (git/forge output, roadmap,
fix index, feature folders) — nothing inferred from memory
✓ Nothing was edited, committed, pushed, or created — read-only, always
✓ `next.recommended` is non-bare (carries the unit's slug/NN, never a bare
`/plan-feature`) AND staged by the target unit's resolved status **and** its
current pre-execution evidence: `idea`/undesigned → `/design-feature <slug>`;
`defined` → `/plan-feature <slug>` only on a current `SPEC-REVIEW-PASS`, else
`/review-spec <slug>`; `planned`/`in-progress` → `/execute-phase <NN>` only on a
current `PLAN-REVIEW-PASS`, else `/review-plan <NN>` (step 6a)
✓ A missing or non-frozen repository-state ledger emits a machine-readable
substrate blocker and routes to discovery or resolution before any unit is
listed as startable
✓ Every `detail.design_candidates[].next` begins with `/design-feature ` — design
candidates always route to design, regardless of anything else
✓ When `--last-envelope` is supplied: the no-progress guard ran (crash-recovery
checklist) — a hint that recommended `/plan-feature`/`/design-feature` for a
unit still at its pre-advance status produces a `workflow_observations` note,
never a silently repeated bland recommendation
✓ `recommendations.product_audit` was computed by the step-16 mechanical
two-condition check (never guessed), and `next.tier` was derived from the
resolved `next.recommended` command via the command→tier map in
`## Machine envelope` (never guessed)
✓ Per-unit `review`/`closure`/`issues_born` (steps 10–12) were computed per
their fixed rules — `adversarial.ran`/`n` stayed `null` unless real
evidence exists, never guessed — and any fired `next.suggested[]` entries
(step 13) quote their owning skill's condition verbatim, never a second
copy of the trigger logic
✓ The envelope is emitted on **every** invocation of this skill, including a
same-session natural-language follow-up about state — never replaced by prose
✓ The emitted envelope was checked against the shape reminders in
`## Machine envelope` (mirroring
`packages/agentic-workflow-schema/envelope.schema.json`) before printing
✓ The human-readable summary is printed, then the machine envelope (fenced
```json — see ## Machine envelope) is the ABSOLUTE last output
With --json-only, skip the human-readable summary: print the envelope alone.
When to use
- Between orchestration steps: an external driver runs it to decide the next command and model tier without parsing prose.
- Before picking work manually: "what can I start right now?"
- Not for judging quality (that's
review-change/audit-pr) or product health (that'sproduct-audit) — this skill reports state, it never judges.
Step 0 — Discover the project (always first)
Per the agent guide's Workflow conventions + documentation map, then
read what THIS skill needs: docs/features/ROADMAP.md, the fix index
(docs/fix/README.md), every in-flight feature folder's TASKS.md +
progress.md + known-issues.md, and docs/features/SHIP_DECISIONS.md if a
ship-roadmap run exists.
Progressive loading — fixed sensor route
The reference allowlist is exactly the seven linked paths below. Never invent or
read another references/ path. This skill is a read-only sensor. Every
invocation loads this baseline in order:
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +6 lines 9f2a3d0511b4
- 4d ago First seen · 144 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 41ffe888278f
workflow-status is a skill published in the GitHub repository gtrabanco/agentic-workflow (20 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 1,869 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
offensive-iot
IoT and embedded device security testing methodology. Covers hardware reconnaissance (UART, JTAG, SWD, SPI flash, I2C EEPROM, eMMC chip-off), firmware acquisition (vendor portals, OTA capture, flash dump, binwalk extraction), firmware analysis (filesystem mounting, binary triage, hardcoded secrets, default credential…
offensive-krack-fragattacks
KRACK (CVE-2017-13077..082) and FragAttacks (CVE-2020-24586..588 + 26139-26147) — key reinstallation, fragmentation, and aggregation attacks against WPA2 supplicants. Covers Vanhoef's test scripts, viability against modern patched stacks (mostly mitigated post-2021), residual unpatched embedded devices and IoT…
create-quarto-report
Create a Quarto document for reproducible reports, presentations, or websites. Covers YAML configuration, code chunk options, output formats, cross-references, and rendering. Use when creating a reproducible analysis report, building a presentation with embedded code, generating HTML, PDF, or Word documents from code…
offensive-mitigations
Security mitigation reference and bypass catalog: ASLR, DEP/NX, RELRO, stack canaries, CFI, sandboxing, seccomp. Covers both detection of enabled mitigations and known bypass techniques. Use when assessing target hardening or planning exploit mitigation bypasses.
offensive-advanced-redteam
Comprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC…
offensive-dependency-confusion
Deep-dive offensive methodology for dependency confusion and namespace attacks across all major package ecosystems. Covers npm scope confusion exploiting the gap between public and private scoped packages and .npmrc misconfigurations where registry mappings fail to pin internal scopes exclusively. Addresses PyPI…