Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GuitarAlchemist/ga --skill compoundgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GuitarAlchemist/gaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/guitaralchemist/ga/compound)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/guitaralchemist/ga/compound"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/guitaralchemist/ga/compound/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/guitaralchemist/ga/compound"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/guitaralchemist/ga/compound.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01092 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00437 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00218 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
Compound scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/compound
The compound engineering flywheel for Guitar Alchemist. Run this after shipping a feature to extract lessons and identify what should be promoted into a higher-level abstraction.
When to Run
- After merging or completing a feature branch
- When you notice yourself writing similar code for the third time
- Before planning the next feature (to see if new vocabulary has emerged)
- On a cadence: weekly or after every 3–4 commits
What It Does
Seven-step loop — every completed feature feeds back into the language and the docs:
Work → Reflect → Compound → Promote → Encode → Govern → Document
| Step | Who | What |
|---|---|---|
| Work | — | Feature is done; git diff is the input |
| Reflect | compound-researcher | Mine changed files for repeated patterns |
| Compound | compound-researcher | Rank patterns by recurrence + impact |
| Promote | fsharp-architect | Decide tier (helper / DU / CE / DSL / MCP tool) per pattern |
| Encode | fsharp-architect | Produce concrete F# design sketch with usage examples |
| Govern | grammar-governor | Audit stability; block or clear each promotion |
| Document | codebase-documenter | Snapshot current system state as .md files |
Recent work
└─► compound-researcher (Reflect + Compound)
└─► fsharp-architect (Promote + Encode)
└─► grammar-governor (Govern)
└─► codebase-documenter (Document)
└─► Compound Report + Snapshots
How to Invoke
/compound
No arguments needed. The skill reads git log and recent file changes automatically.
Execution Steps
Step 1 — Scope the work
git log --oneline -10
git diff --stat HEAD~5..HEAD
Identify which files changed. Focus the rest of the analysis on those files and their immediate neighbours.
Step 2 — Run compound-researcher
Delegate to the compound-researcher agent:
"Mine these changed files for repeated patterns that are candidates for abstraction. Files: [list]. Report the top 3–5 patterns."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 136 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A b22033d9bcb8
Compound is a skill published in the GitHub repository GuitarAlchemist/ga (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,092 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…