Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GuitarAlchemist/ga --skill test-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GuitarAlchemist/gaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/guitaralchemist/ga/test-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/guitaralchemist/ga/test-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/guitaralchemist/ga/test-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/guitaralchemist/ga/test-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/guitaralchemist/ga/test-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00115 | $0.04714 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00057 | $0.02357 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00943 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00471 |
Grade A, and why
test-plan scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
| `ReactComponents/ga-react-components/vite.config.ts` | Vite middleware | integration (curl the endpoint in dev mode) | How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 397 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/test-plan
Closes the "developer forgot to write a test plan" gap. Reads a PR diff, maps each changed file to its likely test surface, and emits a structured set of test cases the author (human or agent) should add before merge.
Invoked as /test-plan for the current branch's open PR, or
/test-plan <PR#> for a specific number.
Sister skills:
/grade-last-pr— post-merge intent-vs-delivery (looks backward)./council— pre-merge gate for one-way doors (escalated review)./test-plan— pre-merge test-coverage proposer (this skill; daily use).
Together they form the before / during / after triangle of PR quality.
When to run
- Right after a PR opens — the
.github/workflows/test-plan-suggester.ymlfires automatically onopened+synchronizeif the PR body lacks a## Test plansection. Re-runs on every push to update the proposal. - Before requesting review — if you wrote a thin
## Test planand want a second opinion on what else to test. - When grading an agent-authored PR low for coverage — re-run after the agent fixes its plan, before merging.
Do NOT invoke for:
- Typo PRs (< 5 changed lines, no logic change) — overhead exceeds value.
- Pure-documentation PRs (only
*.mdoutside tests/docs/contracts) — no test surface. - Revert PRs — the test plan is "the prior PR's test plan, rerun" (use
/grade-last-pron the revert instead). - Unmerged PRs you're about to abandon — wasted budget.
What this skill does NOT do
- Never auto-writes test code. Writing tests requires understanding intent,
fixture layout, and the team's test style — that's an engineering call, not
a heuristic. A future
/test-writeskill could take the proposal as input; this skill stops at the proposal. - Never blocks merge. The workflow posts a comment; it is advisory. The
blocking gate for one-way doors is
/council. For routine PRs, the review process is the gate. - Never edits the PR body. Adds a sticky comment with marker
<!-- test-plan -->. The author owns the body; the bot owns the comment.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 397 lines · 115 tokens per session scan A 71fcf678f1a3
test-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository GuitarAlchemist/ga (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 115 tokens to every session and 4,714 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
axiom-testing
Use when writing ANY test, debugging flaky tests, making tests faster, or choosing Swift Testing vs XCTest. Covers unit tests, UI tests, async testing, test architecture.
designing-tests
Designs and implements testing strategies for any codebase. Use when adding tests, improving coverage, setting up testing infrastructure, debugging test failures, or when asked about unit tests, integration tests, or E2E testing.
test-automation
Execute Vitest and Playwright test suites with result collection and failure analysis.
testing-blocks
Use this when you have made AEM Edge Delivery Services code changes to blocks, scripts, or styles and need to validate them before opening a pull request. Covers unit testing for utilities and logic, browser testing with Playwright, linting, and guidance on what to test and how.
prd-auto-test-loop
A testing workflow driven by a product requirements document (PRD), which describes what a software version should do. It turns acceptance criteria into unit, integration, and end-to-end tests, then records the plan and results.
test-automation-expert
Comprehensive test automation specialist covering unit, integration, and E2E testing strategies. Expert in Jest, Vitest, Playwright, Cypress, pytest, and modern testing frameworks. Guides test pyramid design, coverage optimization, flaky test detection, and CI/CD integration. Activate on 'test strategy', 'unit tests'…