walkthrough-and-control-testing

walkthrough-and-control-testing is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI. It costs 34 tokens per session (3,519 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide to walkthroughs and control tests, which auditors use to follow a business transaction through a company and check whether its internal safeguards work.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for annual audits, SOX audits, process changes, control testing, and evaluating control weaknesses using the COSO internal-control framework.
Why use it?
It helps document how processes operate, identify important checkpoints, and assess whether controls are properly designed and consistently followed.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it for annual audits, SOX audits, process changes, control testing, and evaluating control weaknesses using the COSO internal-control framework.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/guoliang1114-boop/ariaai/walkthrough-and-control-testing
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI --skill walkthrough-and-control-testing
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for walkthrough-and-control-testing

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/guoliang1114-boop/ariaai/walkthrough-and-control-testing/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/guoliang1114-boop/ariaai/walkthrough-and-control-testing)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/guoliang1114-boop/ariaai/walkthrough-and-control-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/guoliang1114-boop/ariaai/walkthrough-and-control-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for walkthrough-and-control-testing

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/guoliang1114-boop/ariaai/walkthrough-and-control-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/guoliang1114-boop/ariaai/walkthrough-and-control-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 34 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,519 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00034 $0.03519
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.01759
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00704
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00352

Measured 11d ago against content hash f311a4206803, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

walkthrough-and-control-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/walkthrough-and-control-testing/SKILL.md · 295 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 295 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

穿行测试与控制测试

When To Use

  • 年度审计中需要了解并测试客户内部控制流程时
  • 识别关键控制点并评估其设计有效性和运行有效性时
  • 客户流程发生重大变更需要重新穿行时
  • SOX合规审计中对财务报告相关控制进行测试时
  • 需要评估控制缺陷(重大缺陷/重要缺陷/一般缺陷)时

Tools

  • write - 创建控制测试工作底稿
  • read - 审阅客户流程文档、制度文件
  • grep - 搜索现有审计底稿中的控制描述
  • glob - 查找相关审计文件
  • bash - 运行抽样计算脚本

Framework

COSO 2013 Internal Control — Integrated Framework

五要素 (Five Components):

  1. Control Environment(控制环境) — 组织的基调,影响员工的控制意识
    • Principle 1-5: 诚信与道德价值观、治理层监督、组织架构、胜任能力、问责制
  2. Risk Assessment(风险评估) — 识别和分析实现目标相关的风险
    • Principle 6-9: 制定清晰目标、识别和分析风险、评估舞弊风险、识别重大变更
  3. Control Activities(控制活动) — 确保管理层指令得以执行的政策和程序
    • Principle 10-12: 选择和开发控制活动、选择和开发IT控制、通过政策和程序部署
  4. Information & Communication(信息与沟通) — 获取和交换信息以支持内部控制
    • Principle 13-15: 使用相关信息、内部沟通、外部沟通
  5. Monitoring Activities(监控活动) — 对内部控制进行持续评估和单独评估
    • Principle 16-17: 持续和/或单独评估、沟通缺陷

穿行测试方法论 (Walkthrough Procedures)

参照 ISA 315 (Revised 2019) §15-18 及 PCAOB AS 2201:

  • 选择单笔交易 — 选取一笔代表性交易从开始到结束追踪全流程
  • 识别控制点 — 在每个关键处理步骤识别预防性或检查性控制
  • 验证控制设计 — 评估控制是否能有效防止或发现重大错报
  • 确认信息流 — 验证交易在各系统和部门间的流转逻辑
  • 文档化 — 记录流程图、风险控制矩阵(RCM)

控制测试方法论 (Test of Controls)

参照 ISA 330 §12-15 及 PCAOB AS 2201 §42-46:

设计有效性测试 (Design Effectiveness):

  • 控制是否针对已识别风险设计
  • 控制执行人是否具备适当权限和胜任能力
  • 控制执行频率是否足以及时防止或发现错报

运行有效性测试 (Operating Effectiveness):

  • 控制是否在测试期间一贯执行
  • 控制是否由适当人员执行
  • 控制执行是否有充分证据支持

抽样方法 (Sampling)

参照 ISA 530 及 AICPA Audit Sampling Guide:

测试类型 推荐样本量 (中等控制频率) 说明
年度1次 1 测试该笔交易
季度4次 2-4 每季度至少1笔
月度12次 5-15 考虑使用间隔抽样
周度52次 15-25 随机或系统抽样
日度250+ 25-40 分层抽样
大量/自动化 1-25+ITGC 依赖ITGC有效性

偏差率容忍度:

  • 0偏差: 样本量=计划样本量,无偏差可接受
  • 1偏差: 评估偏差性质,可能需要扩大样本
  • 2+偏差: 通常表明控制无效,评估对审计策略的影响

Workflow

Step 1: 了解和记录流程

  1. 获取客户制度文件、流程描述
  2. 与客户流程负责人进行访谈
  3. 绘制流程图或编制流程描述文字
  4. 识别流程中的关键控制点

Step 2: 识别风险和控制

  1. 列出流程中的主要风险(错报风险、舞弊风险、合规风险)
  2. 将风险映射到认定(存在/完整性/准确性/截止/分类/计价)
  3. 识别每个风险对应的控制(预防性/检查性)
  4. 编制风险控制矩阵(RCM)

Step 3: 执行穿行测试

  1. 选择一笔代表性交易
  2. 从交易发起到最终记录,逐步追踪
  3. 在每个控制点验证控制设计
  4. 记录穿行过程中观察到的任何设计缺陷
  5. 更新流程图和RCM

Read the full file on GitHub · 295 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 295 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A f311a4206803

Subscribe to this mod's changes

walkthrough-and-control-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository guoliang1114-boop/AriaAI (37 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 3,519 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.