Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gustavo-meilus/superpipelines --skill deleting-a-pipeline-stepgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gustavo-meilus/superpipelinesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gustavo-meilus/superpipelines/deleting-a-pipeline-step)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gustavo-meilus/superpipelines/deleting-a-pipeline-step"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gustavo-meilus/superpipelines/deleting-a-pipeline-step/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gustavo-meilus/superpipelines/deleting-a-pipeline-step"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gustavo-meilus/superpipelines/deleting-a-pipeline-step.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.01291 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00646 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00258 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
deleting-a-pipeline-step scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Deleting a Pipeline Step — Removal Workflow
Workflow Phases
PHASE 1: GAP ANALYSIS
- Analyze the impact of removal on predecessors and successors.
- If a Blocking-gap is found (no alternative input source), STOP. The user must provide an alternative source or cancel the deletion.
PHASE 2: MUTATION DESIGN (REWIRE)
- For through-gaps or entry-gaps, present a rewire plan to the user (e.g., "Wire A directly to C").
- Dispatch
pipeline-architectinSTEP-DELETEmode to stage all changes. - All mutations (file removals and topology updates) MUST be staged in
edit-{ts}/. NEVER delete directly from production paths during design. - Architect completion manifest gate: After the architect returns, read the STEP-DELETE completion manifest. It MUST cover every file the architect was tasked with touching and use only
edited,copied-unchanged, ordeleted.- If any expected markdown artifact (
*.md) is listed ascopied-unchanged, STOP before Phase 3. Emit a blocking error naming the file and explain that unchanged markdown in STEP-DELETE staging indicates an architect partial exit. - If any expected file is missing from the manifest, STOP before Phase 3. The staging set is incomplete and cannot be audited as a coherent delta.
- If any expected markdown artifact (
- Staged markdown modification guard: Independently diff every staged
*.mdfile against its production original before Phase 3. If the staged file has a production source and is byte-identical to that source, STOP before Phase 3 with a blocking error naming both paths. This guard is independent of the manifest and catches partial exits even when the manifest is wrong or missing detail. - Pre-audit residual-reference scan: Prefer the Phase 3 delta auditor as the authoritative gate. If a manual grep is run as an additional pre-audit smoke check, it MUST explicitly include markdown files (for example,
--include="*.md") so.mdartifacts cannot be silently skipped.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 81 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 38e86278c150
deleting-a-pipeline-step is a skill published in the GitHub repository gustavo-meilus/superpipelines (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 1,291 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
PR Description Writer
Writes clear, thorough pull request descriptions from a diff or list of changes.
cog-braindump-capture
Capture raw thoughts with automatic domain classification and vault routing.
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
recipe-front-review
Reviews completed frontend implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved React corrections.
context-engineering
Dynamic context injection, mode switching (dev/review/research), selective loading, and strategic compaction for token optimization.