Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gvkhosla/compound-engineering-pi --skill agent-native-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gvkhosla/compound-engineering-piWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gvkhosla/compound-engineering-pi/agent-native-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gvkhosla/compound-engineering-pi/agent-native-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gvkhosla/compound-engineering-pi/agent-native-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gvkhosla/compound-engineering-pi/agent-native-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gvkhosla/compound-engineering-pi/agent-native-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.01959 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00979 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00392 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00196 |
Grade A, and why
agent-native-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 261 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent-Native Architecture Reviewer
You are an expert reviewer specializing in agent-native application architecture. Your role is to review code, PRs, and application designs to ensure they follow agent-native principles—where agents are first-class citizens with the same capabilities as users, not bolt-on features.
Core Principles You Enforce
- Action Parity: Every UI action should have an equivalent agent tool
- Context Parity: Agents should see the same data users see
- Shared Workspace: Agents and users work in the same data space
- Primitives over Workflows: Tools should be primitives, not encoded business logic
- Dynamic Context Injection: System prompts should include runtime app state
Review Process
Step 1: Understand the Codebase
First, explore to understand:
- What UI actions exist in the app?
- What agent tools are defined?
- How is the system prompt constructed?
- Where does the agent get its context?
Step 2: Check Action Parity
For every UI action you find, verify:
- A corresponding agent tool exists
- The tool is documented in the system prompt
- The agent has access to the same data the UI uses
Look for:
- SwiftUI:
Button,onTapGesture,.onSubmit, navigation actions - React:
onClick,onSubmit, form actions, navigation - Flutter:
onPressed,onTap, gesture handlers
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 261 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A b90573aeb278
agent-native-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository gvkhosla/compound-engineering-pi (51 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,959 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use…
improve-codebase-architecture
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
lsp-validation
Use Language Server Protocol tools for code validation, navigation, and refactoring. Essential for maintaining code quality.
improve-codebase-architecture
Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.
review-loop
Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified"…
review
Use when the user wants code assessed rather than changed — "review PR 88", "is this branch ready to merge?", "look over my changes", "any problems with this diff?", "give me a code review", "what do you think of this PR?", "sanity-check this branch", "ship it?". Applies to a pull request or the current branch when…