Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add gw-space/claude-skillbelt/plugin install skillbeltWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gw-space/claude-skillbelt/doc-preview-pane)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gw-space/claude-skillbelt/doc-preview-pane"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gw-space/claude-skillbelt/doc-preview-pane/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gw-space/claude-skillbelt/doc-preview-pane"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gw-space/claude-skillbelt/doc-preview-pane.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00102 | $0.00623 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.00249 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00125 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
doc-preview-pane scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
doc-preview-pane
cmux 우측에 단일 프리뷰 pane 을 만들어(이미 있으면 재사용) 마크다운 문서를 네이티브
렌더링으로 보여준다. cmux open 이 .md 를 마크다운 프리뷰 탭으로 렌더링하므로 별도
뷰어 불필요.
When to use
- 아키텍처/설계/플랜 성격의 마크다운을 작성하거나 크게 갱신한 직후 — 사용자가 바로 옆에서 렌더링된 문서를 볼 수 있게 한다.
- 사용자가 "이 문서 오른쪽에 띄워줘 / 보여줘" 라고 요청할 때.
평범한 README 편집, 코드 주석, 한두 줄 수정 등에는 쓰지 않는다 (노이즈).
How to use
작성한 문서의 절대경로로 헬퍼 스크립트를 호출한다:
bash "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/doc-preview-pane/scripts/show-doc.sh" <abs-path-to.md> [<more.md> ...]
- 여러 문서를 한 번에 넘기면 같은 우측 pane 에 탭으로 열린다.
- 포커스는 현재 (agent) pane 에 유지된다 — 작업 흐름이 끊기지 않는다.
Behavior & guarantees
- 단일 pane 재사용: workspace 별로 프리뷰 pane UUID 를
~/.local/state/cmux-doc-preview/<workspace-id>.pane에 저장. 다음 호출 때 그 pane 이 살아있으면 재사용(탭 추가), 닫혔으면 새로 split. → 호출할수록 화면이 쪼개지지 않음. - Best-effort: cmux 가 없거나(다른 터미널), workspace 밖이거나, pane 생성/open 이 실패해도 스크립트는
exit 0으로 조용히 빠진다. 문서는 이미 저장돼 있으니 본 작업에는 영향 없음. - agent pane 안전: 항상 전용으로 만든 우측 pane 에만 열고, 현재 작업 중인 pane 에는 절대 열지 않는다.
Notes
- 프리뷰 내용이 갱신되면(문서를 다시 쓰면) 같은 경로로 한 번 더 호출하면 된다.
- 우측 pane 을 사용자가 닫았다면 다음 호출 때 자동으로 다시 만든다.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 41 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A c3f4da478b5c
doc-preview-pane is a skill published in the GitHub repository gw-space/claude-skillbelt (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 102 tokens to every session and 623 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
karpenter
Design, install, debug, review, plan capacity, audit scaling history, migrate from Cluster Autoscaler, and upgrade Karpenter v1.x on EKS. Covers NodePool, EC2NodeClass, NodeClaim, Spot diversity, disruption strategy, Pod Identity/IRSA, interruption queue, private clusters, AMI rotation, and GitOps integration. Use…
pr-review
Comprehensive PR review across six dimensions — cost impact, environment drift, ownership gaps, SOC 2 compliance, deprecated API / version hygiene, and rollback feasibility. Each mode inspects the diff and current file state, reports findings with severity, and recommends concrete fixes. Use when preparing a PR for…
azure
Azure identity (Workload Identity, OIDC, Entra ID), resource tagging, AKS platform patterns, RBAC scoping, and production-readiness review — with Terraform generation.
kubescape
Check Kubernetes manifests, Helm charts, Kustomize overlays and live clusters against NSA-CISA, MITRE ATT&CK, CIS (EKS, AKS, GKE, vanilla) and SOC2 with the Kubescape CLI. Covers framework choice, score and severity gates, PR gates that fail only on new findings (--baseline), exceptions that actually suppress…
chaos
Design, run, and debug Chaos Engineering experiments on Kubernetes using Litmus Chaos v3 and Chaos Mesh v2. Covers fault injection (pod-delete, network-loss, CPU stress, node-drain), steady-state hypothesis probes, GameDay runbooks, scheduled experiments, DORA feedback loop, and RBAC setup. Use when asked to "inject a…
opa
Generate, test, validate, explain, and debug OPA (Open Policy Agent) Rego policies and Conftest configurations. Covers deny/warn/violation rules, unit tests, regal linting, conftest fmt, namespace design, input shape analysis, and GitHub Actions integration. Use when asked to "write a policy", "test a rego file"…