thesis-review-response

thesis-review-response is a skill for Claude Code from gxgeek-n/wenqu-mem. It costs 184 tokens per session (1,607 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A review-response workflow for academic theses that checks current source code before replying to external reviewer comments, especially comments based on an old PDF.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to verify review claims against the current source, identify known false alarms, and distinguish broken citations from extraction artifacts.
Why use it?
It helps separate already-fixed issues and PDF text-extraction errors from problems that still exist.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the wenqu-mem plugin — 21 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to verify review claims against the current source, identify known false alarms, and distinguish broken citations from extraction artifacts.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/gxgeek-n/wenqu-mem/thesis-review-response
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add gxgeek-n/wenqu-mem --skill thesis-review-response
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gxgeek-n/wenqu-mem

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install wenqu-mem, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 21 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for thesis-review-response

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gxgeek-n/wenqu-mem/thesis-review-response/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gxgeek-n/wenqu-mem/thesis-review-response)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gxgeek-n/wenqu-mem/thesis-review-response"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gxgeek-n/wenqu-mem/thesis-review-response/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for thesis-review-response

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gxgeek-n/wenqu-mem/thesis-review-response"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gxgeek-n/wenqu-mem/thesis-review-response.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 184 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,607 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00184 $0.01607
Opus 5 $0.00092 $0.00804
Sonnet 5 $0.00037 $0.00321
Haiku 4.5 $0.00018 $0.00161

Measured 12d ago against content hash d3849cdf6848, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

thesis-review-response scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/thesis-review-response/SKILL.md · 57 lines

The source is not reproduced here

A licence we could not identify

The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.

Read it on GitHub

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 57 lines · 184 tokens per session scan A d3849cdf6848

Subscribe to this mod's changes

thesis-review-response is a skill published in the GitHub repository gxgeek-n/wenqu-mem (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 184 tokens to every session and 1,607 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

writing-humanizer

A text-editing skill that removes patterns often associated with AI-written prose and makes writing sound more natural. Its instructions are aimed mainly at Traditional Chinese text used in Taiwan.

shyuan/writing-humanizer · 92 tokens

awesome-literature-review

A Chinese-language workflow for writing narrative academic literature reviews, which summarize and assess existing research on a topic.

yzbbds520/awesome-literature-review · 312 tokens

chinese-reference-formatter-skill

A reference-formatting skill creates Chinese academic bibliography entries and BibTeX, a machine-readable format for citation tools, from literature titles.

Zechang-Xiong/chinese-reference-formatter-skill · 70 tokens

zhuoyu-workshop

Student project delivery and packaging workflow for Codex. Use when the user needs help with Chinese university student projects, course projects, innovation training projects, competitions, capstones, graduation projects, project defense decks, closing reports, README/GitHub showcase materials, software copyright…

handsomeZR-netizen/zhuoyu-workshop-skill · 81 tokens

academic-figure

A Chinese-language toolkit for making and checking academic charts, diagrams, flowcharts, and graphical abstracts. A graphical abstract is a visual summary of a research paper, while a flowchart shows the steps or decisions in a process.

XYD-GIS/paper-toolkits · 215 tokens

academic-writing

A Chinese academic writing assistant for turning drafts, informal notes, or data into formal research-paper text. It also handles translation, editing, checks, peer-review simulation, and analysis of results.

XYD-GIS/paper-toolkits · 138 tokens