Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gy910210/hermes-research-skills --skill concept-boundary-analyzer-zhgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gy910210/hermes-research-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gy910210/hermes-research-skills/concept-boundary-analyzer-zh)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gy910210/hermes-research-skills/concept-boundary-analyzer-zh"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gy910210/hermes-research-skills/concept-boundary-analyzer-zh/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gy910210/hermes-research-skills/concept-boundary-analyzer-zh"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gy910210/hermes-research-skills/concept-boundary-analyzer-zh.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00105 | $0.00929 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00053 | $0.00464 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
concept-boundary-analyzer-zh scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Hermes 适配说明
- 本 skill 现面向 Hermes 使用,优先依赖 Hermes 原生工具:
search_files、read_file、write_file、patch、session_search、delegate_task、cronjob、browser、web/search、vision。 - 若正文提到
references/...或scripts/...,优先读取当前 skill 目录下对应文件,不再依赖 Claude 专属目录结构。 - 原始 Claude
agents/openai.yaml不作为执行前提;需要并行研究、分工精读或角色评审时,改用 Hermes 的delegate_task。 - 保留原有研究方法论与产物契约,但执行层统一按 Hermes 工具体系落地。
Concept Boundary Analyzer(中文)
这个 skill 适合处理“概念很像,但其实不在一个层级上”的问题。
何时使用
- 用户要求辨析两个或多个概念的边界、界限、关系、定位。
- 用户反复在“产品入口 / 技术方案 / 模型能力 / 业务形态”之间跳转,容易混写。
- 需要判断概念之间是
替代、互补、上下位还是并行分工。
输入
concepts[]: 需要比较的概念列表context_files[](可选):已有主稿、专题稿、技术方案、行业观察稿comparison_focus产品形态技术架构任务边界用户心智工业落地替代与互补
输出
boundary_packetlayered_definitionsboundary_matrixsubstitution_vs_complementaritycommon_confusionsrecommended_canonical_wordingmerge_back_suggestions
工作流
- 先判断每个概念属于哪一层:
- 产品/界面层
- 系统/架构层
- 能力/模型层
- 任务/场景层
- 对每个概念固定工作定义,并标出“它不是什么”。
- 生成边界矩阵,至少覆盖:
- 默认输出
- 默认交互
- 典型任务
- 技术中枢
- 主要 KPI
- 适用品类/场景
- 强制回答:
- 哪些是替代关系?
- 哪些是互补关系?
- 哪些只是在不同层级上相交?
- 标出常见混淆来源,例如:
- 把产品入口当成技术路线
- 把生成能力当成完整系统
- 把复杂任务模式误写成主流默认 UI
- 输出一版“以后知识库里应该固定怎么写”的统一口径。
守护
- 不把“都用了 LLM”当成同一概念。
- 不把“看起来像 chat”误写成“底层已经 agentic”。
- 优先用任务边界和系统职责来分,而不是用营销名称来分。
- 若存在行业报道和内部传闻,只能作为较低证据等级的旁证。
推荐配合
- 已有材料摄取:
../brief-ingester-zh/SKILL.md - 扩展新证据:
../literature-scout-zh/SKILL.md - 稳定写成专题稿:
../research-synthesizer-zh/SKILL.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 75 lines · 105 tokens per session scan A f8eebb072e73
concept-boundary-analyzer-zh is a skill published in the GitHub repository gy910210/hermes-research-skills (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 105 tokens to every session and 929 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
b2b-sdr-agent
Autonomous AI Sales Development Rep for B2B export — handles lead discovery, BANT qualification, multi-channel outreach (WhatsApp/Email/Telegram), CRM management, and deal pipeline tracking. Built for cross-border trade.
loop-engineering
Loop Engineering framework: design autonomous agent feedback cycles instead of hand-prompting each step.
fablize
A harness that makes any model see a task through to the end — with evidence and verification — as procedure, not as luck. Enforces verification grounding (run & observe artifacts before declaring done), multi-story decomposition with an evidence gate, a systematic investigation protocol, and early-stop prevention.…
browser-harness-ats-automation
Automate job applications on ATS platforms (Ashby, Greenhouse, Workday) using browser-use/browser-harness with CDP. Covers iframe session management, file upload, hidden checkbox handling, and known reCAPTCHA/S3 blockers.
job-scraper-pipeline
Automated ML/AI job scraping, deduplication, and gatekeeper scoring pipeline. Scrapes AI company career pages on Greenhouse, AshbyHQ, and Lever, avoids duplicates, and scores jobs 0-100 against profile keywords, classifying tier-1/2/3.
greenhouse-job-application
Automate filling job applications on Greenhouse.io and similar React-based ATS platforms via browser automation. Covers React input handling, reCAPTCHA detection, resume upload limitations, and single-expression multi-field filling.