Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gy910210/hermes-research-skills --skill role-review-panel-zhgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gy910210/hermes-research-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gy910210/hermes-research-skills/role-review-panel-zh)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gy910210/hermes-research-skills/role-review-panel-zh"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gy910210/hermes-research-skills/role-review-panel-zh/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gy910210/hermes-research-skills/role-review-panel-zh"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gy910210/hermes-research-skills/role-review-panel-zh.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.00874 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00437 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
role-review-panel-zh scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Hermes 适配说明
- 本 skill 现面向 Hermes 使用，优先依赖 Hermes 原生工具：
search_files、read_file、write_file、patch、session_search、delegate_task、cronjob、browser、web/search、vision。 - 若正文提到
references/...或scripts/...，优先读取当前 skill 目录下对应文件，不再依赖 Claude 专属目录结构。 - 原始 Claude
agents/openai.yaml不作为执行前提；需要并行研究、分工精读或角色评审时，改用 Hermes 的delegate_task。 - 保留原有研究方法论与产物契约，但执行层统一按 Hermes 工具体系落地。
Role Review Panel（中文）
这个 skill 适合把“一个人的单线分析”升级成“多职责交叉审查后的方案”。
何时使用
- 用户要从架构、产品、算法、工程等多个角色同时审查一个方案。
- 用户明确要求“让不同 agent 互相提问、互相讨论、再收敛”。
- 需要把 survey 继续推进成技术方案、阶段路线图或模块设计。
输入
target_doc或plan_summaryroles[]- 默认：
架构 / 产品 / 算法 / 工程
- 默认：
review_focus完整性可落地性阶段优先级延迟与成本数据与评测风险与边界
rounds: 默认2-3
输出
role_review_packetrole_findingscross_questionsconsensus_pointscore_disagreementsdecision_logrevision_actions
工作流
- 先让每个角色独立审查目标文稿，避免一开始就互相污染判断。
- 每个角色至少回答：
- 这份方案最强的部分是什么？
- 最大风险是什么？
- 最希望别的角色回答什么问题？
- 组织
2-3轮交叉提问：- 架构问产品：目标是否过宽、阶段是否过重
- 产品问算法：哪些能力现在并不成熟
- 算法问工程：哪些链路没有观测与评测基础
- 工程问架构：模块边界、SLA、降级策略是否清楚
- 收敛为三类结果：
- 一致意见
- 关键分歧
- 最终取舍
- 输出可以直接回写文稿的
revision_actions，而不是只给会议纪要。
守护
- 角色讨论要服务于方案收敛，不是表演式辩论。
- 不同角色的批评要落到可修改项，而不是抽象反对。
- 若角色之间分歧无法消除，必须给出默认取舍原则。
- 讨论结果最终要反映到文稿结构、阶段优先级或模块边界上。
推荐配合
- survey 转技术方案：
../research-synthesizer-zh/SKILL.md - 主稿或方案维护：
../report-maintainer-zh/SKILL.md - 证据与措辞审校：
../paper-critic-zh/SKILL.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 70 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 7ade74867ee1
role-review-panel-zh is a skill published in the GitHub repository gy910210/hermes-research-skills (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 874 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
b2b-sdr-agent
Autonomous AI Sales Development Rep for B2B export — handles lead discovery, BANT qualification, multi-channel outreach (WhatsApp/Email/Telegram), CRM management, and deal pipeline tracking. Built for cross-border trade.
loop-engineering
Loop Engineering framework: design autonomous agent feedback cycles instead of hand-prompting each step.
fablize
A harness that makes any model see a task through to the end — with evidence and verification — as procedure, not as luck. Enforces verification grounding (run & observe artifacts before declaring done), multi-story decomposition with an evidence gate, a systematic investigation protocol, and early-stop prevention.…
browser-harness-ats-automation
Automate job applications on ATS platforms (Ashby, Greenhouse, Workday) using browser-use/browser-harness with CDP. Covers iframe session management, file upload, hidden checkbox handling, and known reCAPTCHA/S3 blockers.
job-scraper-pipeline
Automated ML/AI job scraping, deduplication, and gatekeeper scoring pipeline. Scrapes AI company career pages on Greenhouse, AshbyHQ, and Lever, avoids duplicates, and scores jobs 0-100 against profile keywords, classifying tier-1/2/3.
greenhouse-job-application
Automate filling job applications on Greenhouse.io and similar React-based ATS platforms via browser automation. Covers React input handling, reCAPTCHA detection, resume upload limitations, and single-expression multi-field filling.