Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add h4vzz/awesome-ai-agent-skills --skill fact-checkinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/h4vzz/awesome-ai-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/h4vzz/awesome-ai-agent-skills/fact-checking)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/h4vzz/awesome-ai-agent-skills/fact-checking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/h4vzz/awesome-ai-agent-skills/fact-checking/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/h4vzz/awesome-ai-agent-skills/fact-checking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/h4vzz/awesome-ai-agent-skills/fact-checking.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.02116 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01058 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00423 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00212 |
Grade A, and why
fact-checking scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
98% identical to fact-checking — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fact-Checking
This skill enables an AI agent to systematically verify claims and statements. Rather than offering a simple true/false judgment, the agent extracts discrete checkable claims from the input, identifies authoritative sources for each, cross-references evidence, and produces a structured verdict with a confidence score and supporting reasoning. The approach is designed to handle everything from single factual assertions to full articles containing dozens of claims.
Workflow
-
Extract Claims: Parse the input text and isolate individual, verifiable assertions. Each claim should be a single, self-contained statement that can be independently checked. Discard opinions, subjective judgments, and unfalsifiable statements, but note them as "not checkable" in the output.
-
Classify Claim Types: Categorize each claim by type — statistical (involves numbers or data), historical (references past events), scientific (references research findings), definitional (defines a term), or attribution (attributes a statement to a person or organization). The category guides where to look for verification.
-
Identify Authoritative Sources: For each claim, determine the most appropriate verification sources. Use primary sources whenever possible: official datasets for statistics, peer-reviewed papers for scientific claims, archived transcripts for quotations, and government records for legal or policy assertions. Supplement with reputable secondary sources like established fact-checking organizations (Snopes, PolitiFact, Full Fact).
-
Cross-Reference and Evaluate Evidence: Check each claim against at least two independent sources. Note whether sources corroborate, partially support, or contradict the claim. Assess source credibility by considering authority, recency, methodology, and potential bias.
-
Assign Verdicts and Confidence Scores: For each claim, assign a verdict from the scale: True, Mostly True, Half True, Mostly False, False, or Unverifiable. Accompany each verdict with a confidence score (0.0-1.0) reflecting the strength and consistency of available evidence, and a brief justification.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 109 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A bb07ea4e7a6b
fact-checking is a skill published in the GitHub repository h4vzz/awesome-ai-agent-skills (34 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 2,116 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 98% identical to fact-checking, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
cost-optimizer
Trigger when the user asks to audit Claude Code costs, reduce token spend, says "my Claude bill is too high", "optimize my CLAUDE.md", "why is this project burning tokens", or "/cost-optimizer". Scans a project for the common Claude Code cost leaks and returns a prioritized fix list.
excalidraw-architecture
Trigger when the user asks for an architecture diagram, says "draw the system", "update the architecture diagram", "give me an excalidraw of this codebase", or "/excalidraw-architecture". Generates or updates an Excalidraw JSON file at docs/architecture.excalidraw by reading the codebase's key entry points.
model-cost-compare
Trigger when the user asks which model to use, wants to compare model costs, says "what's cheapest for this task", "should I use Opus or Sonnet", "can a smaller model handle this", or "/model-cost-compare". Estimates token cost across Opus 4.6, Sonnet 4.6, GLM-5.1, Minimax M2.7, and local Gemma 4, then recommends the…
openclaw-debugger
Trigger when an OpenClaw agent is broken, silent, crashing, stuck, not responding, returning empty output, or the user says "my agent is down", "agent not working", "/openclaw-debugger". Walks through the standard OpenClaw 2026.4 diagnosis checklist and prints a report.
growth-ideas
Describe your product or project and get three actionable growth ideas tailored to your stage.
meeting-notes
Paste raw meeting notes and get a clean summary with key decisions and action items.