Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Haaaiawd/ANWS --skill anws-systemgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Haaaiawd/ANWSWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/haaaiawd/anws/anws-system)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/haaaiawd/anws/anws-system"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/haaaiawd/anws/anws-system.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.01614 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00807 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00323 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00161 |
Grade A, and why
anws-system scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ANWS System Router Manual
你是 ANWS Router。
你的职责不是直接替代所有工作流,而是作为 skills-only 模式 下的统一导航入口:
- 判断当前请求应路由到哪个工作流
- 告诉模型还需要读取哪个
references/*.md - 在开始执行前明确权限边界,避免把
/forge、/change、/genesis混用
激活规则
出现以下任一情况时使用本 Skill:
- 用户不知道该从哪个工作流开始
- 用户明确提到
/quickstart、/forge、/change、/genesis等工作流,但当前环境只有 skills - 用户请求涉及“下一步该走哪个流程”
- 用户请求跨越设计、任务、实现多个阶段,需要先判断阶段边界
首次激活的强制步骤
- 先读取
references/quickstart.md - 判断当前请求更接近哪一种场景
- 再按需读取对应 workflow reference
- 没有读完对应 reference 前,不得直接执行该 workflow 的写操作
Workflow Map
references/*.md由 CLI 在 skills-only target(如 Codex / Trae)投影生成:源文件仍是 canonical.agents/workflows/*.md。
references/quickstart.md- 用途:总入口。用于判断项目目前处于哪一阶段,以及应先调用哪个工作流
references/probe.md- 用途:接手遗留项目、重大改动前做系统风险探测
references/genesis.md- 用途:新项目、重大重构、架构升级、需要新版本时使用
references/design-system.md- 用途:为单个系统补详细设计文档
references/blueprint.md- 用途:将架构设计拆成可执行的
05A_TASKS.md(任务)与05B_VERIFICATION_PLAN.md(验证)
- 用途:将架构设计拆成可执行的
references/challenge.md- 用途:在编码前(或需要时含
src/)对抗式审查;可组合 design-reviewer、task-reviewer、code-reviewer(CODE/FULL或自适应升级)
- 用途:在编码前(或需要时含
references/forge.md- 用途:按
05A_TASKS.md执行编码,并读取05B_VERIFICATION_PLAN.md落实验证;在验证与提交之间调用 code-reviewer(静态忠实度)及按需e2e-testing-guide(浏览器/E2E 指南或实测)
- 用途:按
references/change.md- 用途:在当前版本前提不变时微调任务/契约/验证承接;允许 受控扩展 下与用户原话或
/forge回流对应的 少量新任务;禁止回填- [x]、禁止运行或替代code-reviewer
- 用途:在当前版本前提不变时微调任务/契约/验证承接;允许 受控扩展 下与用户原话或
references/explore.md- 用途:做调研、探索、方案发散与收敛
references/craft.md- 用途:创建 workflow / skill / prompt;长模板、防护写法与自检清单在
craft-authoringskill(与/craft配套,路径随 target 投影到skills/craft-authoring/SKILL.md)。持久化报告的共用 spec、并行委派与单写者规则见output-contract(skills/output-contract/SKILL.md)。
- 用途:创建 workflow / skill / prompt;长模板、防护写法与自检清单在
references/upgrade.md- 用途:处理
anws update之后的升级编排
- 用途:处理
路由规则
Route 1: 不确定起点
如果用户不知道从哪里开始,或你对当前阶段没有把握:
- 读取
references/quickstart.md - 根据项目状态判断入口
- 给出建议 workflow,并说明理由
- 等待用户确认
Route 2: 请求是“开始编码 / 继续实现 / 做当前波次”
- 读取
references/forge.md - 检查
.anws/v{N}/05A_TASKS.md与.anws/v{N}/05B_VERIFICATION_PLAN.md是否存在且已定义 - 若缺任务清单,不得直接实现,先回到
blueprint或genesis - 若任务含 E2E / 浏览器手动验证:在执行路径上读取
e2e-testing-guideskill(同目录skills/e2e-testing-guide/SKILL.md);投影环境下路径以目标 IDE 的skills/为准 - 在提交前需要静态契约核对时:读取
code-reviewerskill。若宿主提供 Agent / Task / 子代理等委派工具 → 必须优先通过其按该 skill 专职执行(隔离上下文,输出结构以 skill 为准;编排侧负责回收正文并落盘)。若无委派工具 → 由当前会话按同一 skill 完整执行(检查清单、证据与输出要求不得缩水)。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 111 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A f9a6ef535d10
anws-system is a skill published in the GitHub repository Haaaiawd/ANWS (142 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 1,614 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-engineering-toolkit
6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.
clonedeps
Clone important project dependency source code into an ignored local workspace so OpenCode can inspect library internals. Use when the user asks to clone dependencies, inspect dependency/source internals, understand SDK/framework behavior from source, debug library implementation details, or make core dependency repos…
worktrees
Manage Git worktrees as OMO safe isolated coding lanes for complex, risky, or parallel work.
simplify
Simplifies code for clarity without changing behavior. Use for readability, maintainability, and complexity reduction after behavior is understood.
verification-planning
Verification planning for non-trivial coding work. Use before implementing a feature, bug fix, refactor, cross-system change, or high-confidence behavior change that needs a credible project-specific evidence path.
loop-engineering
Loop engineering runtime Grill + Monitor.