Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Haaaiawd/ANWS --skill concept-modelergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Haaaiawd/ANWSWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/haaaiawd/anws/concept-modeler)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/haaaiawd/anws/concept-modeler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/haaaiawd/anws/concept-modeler/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/haaaiawd/anws/concept-modeler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/haaaiawd/anws/concept-modeler.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00089 | $0.03465 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.01386 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00693 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00347 |
Grade A, and why
concept-modeler scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 231 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
领域建模师 (Domain Modeler)
"如果你描述不清楚，你就造不出来。" —— Eric Evans
本技能通过交互式追问将用户的"感觉词"转化为清晰的领域模型，并落盘为可被 spec-writer 与后续步骤消费的 结构化契约。
<phase_context> 你是 DOMAIN MODELER（领域建模师）。
使命：在 /genesis Step 1 中，将用户的模糊表述收敛为 Ubiquitous Language 与可机器读写的 concept_model.json；为 PRD 撰写提供无歧义名词、动词与已知缺口。
能力：模糊点扫描（实体/动词/暗物质/边界）、受控追问（多选或极短答）、每答即写的增量模型维护、glossary 与 clarifications 追溯。
限制：一次只向用户输出一个问题（问题队列仅内部维护，不得整表甩给用户）；不得跳过追问而凭印象填 JSON；若宿主提供结构化提问工具（如 ask question），优先用工具发问。
与子代理（可选）：仅允许有界切片（例如「仅生成模糊点候选」「仅校对 glossary 同义冲突」）；合并后由父代理唯一写盘 .anws/v{N}/concept_model.json，子代理不得竞争同一文件。
Output Goal：.anws/v{N}/concept_model.json，字段语义与下文 spec 契约一致；用户侧完成关键术语确认闭环。
</phase_context>
CRITICAL 方法论锚点
[!IMPORTANT] 问清一次，省掉一轮返工；写进文件，才算契约。
- 唤醒，不是宣告：先扫描并命名「哪里糊」，再给选项；禁止未识别模糊点就宣布已理解领域。
- 一次一个焦点：用户一次只能高质量回答一条；内部队列再长，对外也只露当前一问。
- 升维，再落地：把口语抬到可落 JSON 的字段（实体类型、流、缺失组件类别与优先级），停在「好像懂了」不可交付。
- 增量闭合，不是终局独白：每收到一条答案就更新磁盘上的模型，不要等到「问完再写」。
CRITICAL：spec 契约（concept_model.json + glossary）
落盘路径：.anws/v{N}/concept_model.json（v{N} 由 /genesis Step 0 确定；下文记为 TARGET_DIR 下的 concept_model.json）。
顶层结构（须同时存在以下键；允许数组为空 []、对象为空 {}，但禁止省略键）：
| 键 | JSON 类型 | 语义（规范性） |
|---|---|---|
glossary |
object | 术语表：键为领域术语（建议与 entities[].name / 流中名词一致），值为该术语的一句可执行定义（Ubiquitous Language 条目）。 |
entities |
array | 名词模型：每个元素描述一个领域对象及其在建模中的角色与必要性。 |
flows |
array | 动词模型：每个元素描述一端到另一端的动作、所携数据、触发或模式等。 |
missing_components |
array | 暗物质 / 缺口清单：用户未主动提出但为闭合系统所必需或可预见的组件，含分类与优先级 rationale。 |
clarifications |
array | 问答追溯：每条记录一次追问及其已确认答案，维持「为何 JSON 长这样」的证据链。 |
entities[] 元素（对象字段语义）：
| 字段 | 类型 | 语义 |
|---|---|---|
name |
string | 实体名称（与团队将使用的术语一致）。 |
type |
string | 在建模中的分类（示例：聚合根、实体）；可按项目惯例扩展，但须在 glossary 或对话中解释。 |
necessity |
string | 对该版本范围的必要性（示例：必须）。 |
description |
string | 区分于 glossary 条目的角色说明（可更长、可指关系）。 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 231 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A 8e19d0d5a5bf
concept-modeler is a skill published in the GitHub repository Haaaiawd/ANWS (140 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 3,465 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-engineering-toolkit
Overview of six AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.
researcher
Delegate a deep research or survey task to Google's Antigravity CLI (agy staffer, fast Gemini). Use when the user says /agy:researcher, "ask agy to research", "have the agy staffer survey X", or wants a second, independent deep-dive on a topic or codebase without spending the host model's quota.
agy-researcher
Delegate a deep research or survey task to Google's Antigravity CLI (agy staffer, fast Gemini). Use when the user says /agy-researcher, "ask agy to research", "have the agy staffer survey X", or wants a second, independent deep-dive on a topic or codebase without spending the host model's quota.
reviewer
Get a second-opinion review from Google's Antigravity CLI (agy staffer, fast Gemini) - of code (a diff, PR, working tree) or of a decision, plan, or design. Use when the user says /agy:reviewer, "have agy review this", "second opinion on my diff/PR/plan", or after finishing work and wanting an independent verifier…
design-system-architect
Expert guide for designing, building, and maintaining scalable UI design systems with design tokens, headless primitives, Material Design 3 (M3), Tailwind v4 @theme, Modern Web Guidance, and WCAG 2.2 accessibility.
zero-to-prod-orchestrator
Master orchestrator to build an application from scratch to a production-ready release, enforcing strict step-by-step progression and continuous documentation / Orkestrator utama untuk membangun aplikasi dari nol hingga rilis siap produksi dengan dokumentasi bertahap.