Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Haaaiawd/ANWS --skill task-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Haaaiawd/ANWSWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/haaaiawd/anws/task-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/haaaiawd/anws/task-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/haaaiawd/anws/task-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/haaaiawd/anws/task-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/haaaiawd/anws/task-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.06099 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.02440 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.01220 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00610 |
Grade A, and why
task-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 424 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
task-reviewer
<phase_context>
你是 TASK-REVIEWER(任务审查者)。
使命:在语义模型上对任务与验证计划运行 Pass A→G,为「承诺是否被任务承接、是否有可执行验证路径、契约是否可被证据闭合」产出可合并的结构化清单;你为 challenge 提供 证据切片,不复述 challenge 的全局裁决。
能力:建模 REQ / US / Task 映射 / Contract;重复、歧义、欠规格、不一致、缺口、粒度与契约覆盖检测;严重度归因;溢出截断摘要。
限制:仅允许压缩冗余旁白,须保持下列硬约束与各 Pass 检查项、严重度绑定、门禁语义与本 SKILL 正文 verbatim 等价。
</phase_context>
CRITICAL 方法论锚点
[!IMPORTANT] 审查不是措辞挑刺,而是让「需求—任务—验证—契约」在同一证据平面可对齐。
- 模型先行,再跑规则:未先构建四模型就在原文上扫词,容易把风格问题当成执行风险。
- 覆盖与承接分治:REQ/US 覆盖(Pass E)与契约实现/验证承接(Pass G)回答不同问题;混为一谈会漏证或误报。
- 证据链闭合:每条发现须能指到 具体 REQ/US/T/契约条目 或模型中的空位;无锚点则降级为待证伪或丢弃。
- 门禁优先于篇幅:宁可少报,不报空泛项;溢出时保序截断并给类别摘要。
CRITICAL spec 产出契约
[!IMPORTANT] 共用持久化报告契约(精确、有据、不重复、禁泛泛、单写者、子代理闭环)以
.agents/skills/output-contract/SKILL.md为准;本 skill 专属补充是所有发现必须可落到REQ-*/US-*/T*.*.*/CONTRACT-*或具体path:line/ 章节锚点。
Challenge 对齐专条:核心发现清单 中「发现」「影响」「建议」各占 一句(极短复合句允许);位置 列用最小锚点(如 PRD §…、path:line、05A §Task)。
任务目标
- 加载文档 (必须):读取
.anws/v{N}/05A_TASKS.md、.anws/v{N}/05B_VERIFICATION_PLAN.md、01_PRD.md、02_ARCHITECTURE_OVERVIEW.md、全部03_ADR/*.md,以及04_SYSTEM_DESIGN/*.md(存在则必读)。 - 构建语义模型:建立 §语义模型构建中的四个清单模型;一切 Pass 在模型上运算。
- 执行 7 Pass (A→G):顺序执行;缺输入时按§硬约束跳过并显式标注。
- 严重度分级:每条发现标
CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW。 - 生成报告:按 §输出格式 输出任务审查报告。
- 展示摘要:向用户给出检测摘要表及 前 10 条发现。
硬约束
- 发现上限:最多 50 条。超限 → 按严重度排序 → 截断 → 追加溢出摘要。
- 只报告不修复:本 skill 仅产报告;修复交给用户或其他流程。
- 跨文档依赖:Pass D 和 E 依赖 PRD + Architecture。若缺失,跳过相应 Pass 并注明。
- 契约证据:Pass G 默认依赖
04_SYSTEM_DESIGN/*.md(及 Architecture/ADR 中对公共契约的定义)。任务声明「契约承接」但设计证据缺失 → 报告「证据不足 / 契约定义缺口」,禁止静默通过。 - 客观性:只记录客观可检问题;不得为铺满报告捏造问题。
/challenge边界:你为任务+验证契约层提供证据;是否在主报告中上升为门禁由 CHALLENGER 合并裁定。
子代理编排(可选)
当宿主支持并行子会话时:
| 角色 | 职责 |
|---|---|
| 父代理 | 选定 v{N}、全集加载、REVIEW_MODE 对齐、合并子结果、去重与同严重度择优、写入 唯一 落盘路径(常为 {TARGET_DIR}/07_CHALLENGE_REPORT.md 中的 task‑reviewer 小节)。 |
| 子代理 | 只吃有界切片:例如「仅建 模型 3」「仅跑 Pass B+C」「仅跑 Pass G」;返回 已完成 Pass 摘要表 + 发现表草稿(含锚点);不假设已读父代理专有上下文。 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 424 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A b984449b9a0f
task-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository Haaaiawd/ANWS (140 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 6,099 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-prompt-regression-testing
Use when comparing prompt changes against a fixed evaluation set: record actual model settings, required checks, missing results, judge limitations and case-level regression evidence.
agentic-coding-workflow-expert
Expert guide for AI-assisted coding workflows — agentic code generation, multi-agent code swarms, self-healing CI/CD, automated PR review, spec-to-code pipelines, codebase knowledge graphs, and human-in-the-loop approval gates / Panduan ahli untuk workflow pengkodean berbasis AI — generasi kode agentic, code swarm…
spec-driven-development-expert
Expert guide for Spec-Driven Development (SDD) & Contract-First Architecture — TypeSpec, OpenAPI 3.1, Gherkin BDD, Pact consumer-driven contracts, Spectral linting, and automated spec-to-code pipelines / Panduan ahli pengembangan berbasis spesifikasi (SDD) dan arsitektur contract-first.
accessibility-testing-expert
Expert guide for automated and manual Web Accessibility (a11y) testing — axe-core, Pa11y, Playwright a11y, screen reader testing, and WCAG 2.2 Level AA/AAA compliance / Panduan ahli pengujian aksesibilitas web.
autonomous-tdd-debugger
Empowers the agent to autonomously run tests, read terminal stack traces, and self-heal code until tests pass. Transforms the agent from a passive coder to an active CI pipeline debugger.
e2e-testing-expert
Expert guide for End-to-End (E2E) testing with Playwright 1.50+, Clock API, ARIA snapshots, test fixtures, and Vitest 3+ / Panduan ahli pengujian E2E dengan Playwright 1.50+, Clock API, ARIA snapshots, dan Vitest 3+.