feedback-review

feedback-review is a skill for Claude Code from haabe/mycelium. It costs 29 tokens per session (2,323 once invoked), scanned B, original, MIT.

A review that combines signals from active feedback loops, which are repeated checks on how work is progressing and what users or systems are reporting. It reports health, direction over time, overdue checks, regressions, and cases where a metric may be rewarded at the expense of the real goal.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to periodically check feedback-loop health, investigate trajectory changes, find overdue checks, and review possible Goodhart’s Law violations.
Why use it?
It provides one place to spot declining feedback, missed reviews, repeated problems, and misleading metrics.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} variable. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions Claude Code.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the mycelium plugin — 61 skills, 6 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to periodically check feedback-loop health, investigate trajectory changes, find overdue checks, and review possible Goodhart’s Law violations.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add haabe/mycelium
Claude Code
/plugin install mycelium

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install mycelium, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 61 skills, 6 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for feedback-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/haabe/mycelium/feedback-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/haabe/mycelium/feedback-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/haabe/mycelium/feedback-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/haabe/mycelium/feedback-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 29 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,323 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan B 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00029 $0.02323
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.01162
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00465
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00232

Measured 7d ago against content hash f9791c8db5c8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade B, and why

feedback-review scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping

.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.

grep -o "<prefix>-[0-9][0-9]*" .claude/canvas/<file>.yml | sort -u -t- -k2 -n | tail -3
plugins/mycelium/skills/feedback-review/SKILL.md · 145 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Feedback Review

Single-place health check across all Mycelium feedback loops. Run periodically or when something feels off.

Preflight: Read target canvas file(s) before any Write/Edit

Hard rule. Before issuing Write or Edit against any .claude/canvas/*.yml, use the Read tool on that file in this session. Claude Code's Read-before-Write check requires the Read tool specifically — cat/head/grep via Bash do NOT satisfy it.

Edit vs Write — different cost profiles (verified 2026-05-14):

  • Edit (exact-string replacement): Read with limit: 1 satisfies the check at ~50 tokens. State-tracking is per-file, not per-byte — subsequent Edit calls work anywhere in the file. Use this for partial updates against large canvas files (e.g., purpose.yml at 800+ lines).
  • Write (full replacement): do a full Read first. Write obliterates the file; you should see what you're about to replace. The limit:1 shortcut is not appropriate here.

ID-bearing entries — scan the ID space before assigning (added 2026-05-15, v0.23.19): When adding a new component, opportunity, solution, or any other ID-bearing entry to a canvas file, run a Bash grep first to confirm the next ID in your prefix sequence is actually free:

grep -o "<prefix>-[0-9][0-9]*" .claude/canvas/<file>.yml | sort -u -t- -k2 -n | tail -3

Replace <prefix> with the canvas's ID prefix (comp for landscape, opp for opportunities, sol for solutions, ht for human-tasks, etc.). Then pick the next free integer, matching the zero-padding already used in that file. The sort is NUMERIC (-t- -k2 -n) rather than lexical, and that is not pedantry: a plain sort -u orders ht-1 after ht-080, so on a canvas with inconsistent padding it reports the wrong maximum and the next ID collides. Verified on the dogfood repo 2026-08-13, where lexical sort returned ht-1 as the highest human-task ID against an actual ht-080. grep -o is also deliberate: it matches IDs wherever they appear, including cross-references and prose, so an ID that was promised somewhere but not yet defined is not handed out twice. validate_canvas.py has a duplicate-ID check (lines 230-239) that catches the failure on CI, but a duplicate can persist in the working tree for days if CI isn't run between edit and discovery — see roadmap-repo corrections.md 2026-05-15 "Duplicate canvas ID created in landscape.yml" for the worked example.

Read the full file on GitHub · 145 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 145 lines · 29 tokens per session scan B f9791c8db5c8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

feedback-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository haabe/mycelium (45 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 2,323 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

code-quality

Comprehensive skill for improving code quality through two-stage review (spec compliance first, then code quality), surgical refactoring, and self-evaluation loops.

PracticalSwan/agent-skills · 53 tokens

review

Reviews code changes for concrete bugs with P0-P2 prioritized findings. Uses parallel architectural and implementation reviewers, then validates findings to remove false positives. Use when reviewing a caller-supplied diff, branch, staged changes, file set, or pull request, and use fix mode with caller-supplied…

brsbl/ottonomous · 83 tokens

summary

Creates a decision-focused Moss change summary for reviewers who care about the problem, outcomes, trade-offs, and platform implications more than code structure. Use for pull-request summaries, release notes, branch or diff overviews, implementation handoffs, and explanations of what changed and why it matters.…

brsbl/ottonomous · 99 tokens

development-estimation

Use when estimating time, effort, cost, or complexity for features, projects, refactors, and bug backlogs. Produces defensible estimates via triage, decomposition, risk handling, and confidence intervals, with clear assumptions and validation steps.

frumu-ai/tandem · 53 tokens

general-assistant

Summarize, translate, review code, generate text - short answers only.

elisymlabs/elisym · 19 tokens

byte-review

Review a product, implementation, plan, or deliverable for material issues and readiness. Use when the user asks for review, audit, critique, quality assessment, or what should change next.

elan6666/your-bytedance-skills · 41 tokens