orbital-express: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/review-conventions/SKILL.md

review-conventions is a skill for Claude Code from Hackbyrd/orbital-express. It costs 65 tokens per session (1,274 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review checklist that compares new or changed code with the project's documented coding rules and patterns.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit your own changes, review a code diff or pull request, and identify the exact files and lines that need correction.
Why use it?
It helps catch convention violations before work is declared finished or a code change is reviewed.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is Hackbyrd/orbital-express's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on orbital-express itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything orbital-express configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to Hackbyrd/orbital-express. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Hackbyrd/orbital-express/main/.claude/skills/review-conventions/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Hackbyrd/orbital-express

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-conventions

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hackbyrd/orbital-express/review-conventions/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hackbyrd/orbital-express/review-conventions)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hackbyrd/orbital-express/review-conventions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hackbyrd/orbital-express/review-conventions/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-conventions

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hackbyrd/orbital-express/review-conventions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hackbyrd/orbital-express/review-conventions.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 65 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,274 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00065 $0.01274
Opus 5.5 $0.00026 $0.00510
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00013 $0.00255
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00127

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 38eb02ebb767, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-conventions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/review-conventions/SKILL.md · 62 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review against conventions (self-audit)

Run this against the files you created/changed BEFORE saying a task is done, or when reviewing a diff. Go through every applicable item; for each, point to the file:line and fix violations. The authoritative rules are docs/conventions.txt and the README — this is the fast checklist.

First run dependency-free yarn conventions:check. This self-audit remains mandatory even when the automated check passes.

Feature structure

  • Plan/sign-off happened before scaffolding or edits.
  • Every app/<Feature> has complete standard structure; no model-only/table-only exceptions. Extra domain files are allowed.
  • yarn repair <Feature> --dry-run was reviewed before repair; repair did not overwrite existing files; reported wiring ambiguity was resolved manually.
  • Root routes/models/workers/errors rely on auto-discovery; actions live in actions/.

Every JS file

  • Header comment → 'use strict' → env → built-ins → third-party → services → helpers → models → queues (queue.get('XQueue') instances, right after models) → consts → module.exports (before methods) → methods.
  • Imports ordered by increasing length; plain requires before destructured.
  • Every named function closed with // END <name>.
  • No require of a feature's own services/socket from an action it's called by (use the context object).

Actions / controllers / routes

  • Action name V{version}{Action}[By{Role}][On{Device}]; file matches.
  • JSDoc lists route, auth, Roles, req.args, Success, and every Error: code.
  • Uses req.args (never req.body/req.query); POST/GET only; req.args = value after Joi (type coercion).
  • Joi-validates args; HTTP action returns errorResponse(req, ...) (or errorResponseRollback(t, ...) inside a transaction); socket/task throws; catch re-throws (no manual 500).
  • Returned records exclude sensitive fields (attributes: { exclude: models.x.getSensitiveData() }).
  • Action AND controller have JSDoc headers (route, auth, Roles, args, Success, every Error).
  • Flat success { status, success: true, ...payload }; status 200/201/202 correct; no data nesting.
  • Controller is thin (role → action → res.status(result.status).json(result), next(error)); route is registered in the feature (root discovery is automatic).
  • Role/device variants are separate methods (no role if/else in one); pure logic extracted to helper.js.
  • Generated via yarn gen (not hand-created); existing source/test/mailer targets were not overwritten; action/task indexes are deduplicated and deterministic.

Read the full file on GitHub · 62 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 62 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 38eb02ebb767

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-conventions is a skill published in the GitHub repository Hackbyrd/orbital-express (15 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 1,274 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

agent-teams-simplify-and-harden

Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills · 115 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens