Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hackerFish/awesome-dsh-skills --skill dsh-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hackerFish/awesome-dsh-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hackerfish/awesome-dsh-skills/dsh-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hackerfish/awesome-dsh-skills/dsh-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hackerfish/awesome-dsh-skills/dsh-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hackerfish/awesome-dsh-skills/dsh-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hackerfish/awesome-dsh-skills/dsh-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00363 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00145 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00073 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
dsh-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
结构化代码审查
六维检查（按优先级）
- 正确性：逻辑是否实现意图；边界条件（空、单元素、超长、负数、并发）是否处理
- 安全：外部输入是否校验/转义；密钥是否泄漏；命令注入、路径穿越是否存在
- 可维护性：命名是否表达意图；函数是否单一职责；重复代码是否应提取
- 错误处理：失败路径是否可观测；错误信息是否可定位
- 测试：关键路径是否有测试；测试是否测了行为而不是实现细节
- 文档：接口变化是否同步文档与版本号
审查报告格式
文件:行号 | 严重级(阻断/建议/吹毛求疵) | 事实 | 建议
- 先列阻断项，再列建议项；吹毛求疵的合并成一条
- 只批评可复现的事实，不评价作者
- 拿不准的标注"需讨论"，不要用"显然""一定"下判断
自查用法
把上面的清单当成自己的代码出门前检查：提交 PR 前先以审查者视角过一遍。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 31 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A b40434b68618
dsh-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository hackerFish/awesome-dsh-skills (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 363 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-cn
A Chinese-language guide for reviewing code changes, pull requests, and diffs. It prioritizes correctness, resource cleanup, security, matching documentation, and tests before style.
refactor-safely
A safe code-refactoring guide for changing code structure while keeping its external behavior the same. Refactoring means reorganizing code without changing what it does.
pr-description
A writing guide for pull request descriptions. A pull request is a proposed set of code changes for review and merging.
code-review-zh
A Git-based code review workflow that compares changes from a chosen commit, branch, tag, or merge point. It checks both whether the code follows the repository's written standards and whether it implements the requested specification.
improve-codebase-architecture-zh
A codebase architecture review that scans for modules that hide useful complexity poorly, then produces a visual HTML report and discusses one selected finding in depth.
implement-zh
An implementation workflow for completing work described in a specification or tickets. It encourages test-first development where appropriate, runs checks during the work, and ends with review and a commit.