Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hackerFish/awesome-dsh-skills --skill dsh-pr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hackerFish/awesome-dsh-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hackerfish/awesome-dsh-skills/dsh-pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hackerfish/awesome-dsh-skills/dsh-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hackerfish/awesome-dsh-skills/dsh-pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hackerfish/awesome-dsh-skills/dsh-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hackerfish/awesome-dsh-skills/dsh-pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00277 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00138 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00055 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
dsh-pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
PR 审查
审查前
- 自己先过一遍：测试通过、无密钥、无调试残留
- PR 单一目的：一个 PR 只解决一个问题；范围过大先要求拆分
检查清单
- 行为：改动是否实现描述；边界条件是否覆盖
- 安全：输入校验、密钥、权限
- 兼容：是否影响其他调用方；DSH 版本是否标注
- 测试：关键路径覆盖；测试是否测行为
- 文档：README/CHANGELOG 是否同步
反馈格式
文件:行号 | 严重级(阻断/建议/吹毛求疵) | 事实 | 建议
- 只陈述可复现的事实，不评价作者
- 非阻断的琐碎问题合并为一条，避免刷屏
- 拿不准的标"需讨论"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 31 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A dcb225fcc724
dsh-pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository hackerFish/awesome-dsh-skills (5 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 277 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-cn
A Chinese-language guide for reviewing code changes, pull requests, and diffs. It prioritizes correctness, resource cleanup, security, matching documentation, and tests before style.
pr-description
A writing guide for pull request descriptions. A pull request is a proposed set of code changes for review and merging.
refactor-safely
A safe code-refactoring guide for changing code structure while keeping its external behavior the same. Refactoring means reorganizing code without changing what it does.
code-review-zh
A Git-based code review workflow that compares changes from a chosen commit, branch, tag, or merge point. It checks both whether the code follows the repository's written standards and whether it implements the requested specification.
improve-codebase-architecture-zh
A codebase architecture review that scans for modules that hide useful complexity poorly, then produces a visual HTML report and discusses one selected finding in depth.
implement-zh
An implementation workflow for completing work described in a specification or tickets. It encourages test-first development where appropriate, runs checks during the work, and ends with review and a commit.