Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Hainrixz/claude-db --skill db-normalizationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Hainrixz/claude-dbWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hainrixz/claude-db/db-normalization)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hainrixz/claude-db/db-normalization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hainrixz/claude-db/db-normalization/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hainrixz/claude-db/db-normalization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hainrixz/claude-db/db-normalization.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.01107 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00443 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
db-normalization scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 54 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
db-normalization (M1)
Normalization is the spine of relational design: it removes update/insert/delete anomalies by giving every fact one home. This module audits 1NF→3NF and the deliberate, documented exceptions (denormalization for read paths). It is design-axis only. For document/KV paradigms this module is replaced by Access-pattern&embedding in the profile — do not penalise a Mongo collection for "lacking 3NF".
What it checks
- 1NF — atomicity: columns holding lists (
tags VARCHARwith comma-separated values,phone_numbers TEXT), repeating-group columns (addr1, addr2, addr3,item_1, item_2), or arrays used as a join-table substitute. Static signal: column name patterns + atext/varchartype carrying delimited data in sample DDL/comments. - 2NF — partial dependency: on a composite PK, a non-key column that depends on only part of the key (e.g.
order_items(order_id, product_id, product_name)whereproduct_namedepends onproduct_idalone). - 3NF — transitive dependency: a non-key column functionally determined by another non-key (e.g.
employees(id, dept_id, dept_name)—dept_namebelongs indepartments). - Denormalization discipline: duplicated/derived columns (
total,full_name, cached counts) with no generated-column definition, no trigger, and no documented refresh path — these drift silently. Cross-check withdb-defaults-generated(M6).
Axis & severity
- Axis: design. Magnitude banded high|medium|low, never a fabricated anomaly rate.
- Repeating groups / CSV-in-a-column on a high-write table: severity 3–4,
warn/fail, confidencedirectional(static). - Transitive dependency causing redundant updatable data: severity 3,
warn. - Undocumented denormalized duplicate that can drift: severity 3,
warn,fixable: proposed. - M1 never holds a severity-5 cap; it shapes the Modelado category value.
Tier-0 static check
Parse DDL via scripts/parse-schema.mjs and inspect column inventories: flag delimited-list column names, repeating numbered columns, and non-key columns whose name matches another table's entity (*_name, *_label alongside a *_id). Program-source parses stay directional and never cap.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +1 lines ea088a0a4a9e
- 1mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 54f0736e7a85
db-normalization is a skill published in the GitHub repository Hainrixz/claude-db (21 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,107 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
malloy-lookml-review
Analyze LookML files as prior art for Malloy modeling. Used during Step 1 (DISCOVER) when .lkml files are present. Coordinates reference files that extract business logic, relationships, and curation decisions. Works with or without a database connection.
triage-contributor-pr
Triage open pull requests from external contributors to prisma/orm and produce a per-PR verdict with evidence. Use when a maintainer asks to triage, evaluate, assess, or review the queue of incoming contributor PRs, to decide whether a fork PR is safe to run CI on, to check whether a PR is in scope for its version…
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
review-prs
Review a GitHub pull request in the googleapis/mcp-toolbox repo against the team's reviewer checklist: PR title/description conventions, linked issue, logic errors and unhandled edge cases, breaking changes, test coverage, docs updates, security (input handling), and new dependencies. Use whenever a maintainer asks…
migration-review
Review database migration files when a change adds or modifies paths under migrations/. Use it before merge to collect forward, rollback, locking, and data-safety evidence.
dynamodb
Use when modeling or operating a DynamoDB table: deriving partition/sort keys from access patterns, single-table vs table-per-entity, adding a GSI/LSI, on-demand vs provisioned capacity, or diagnosing hot-partition throttling. NOT relational schema/SQL/EXPLAIN (that is postgresdb), NOT aggregation-pipeline document…