Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Hainrixz/claude-seo-ai/plugin install claude-seo-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hainrixz/claude-seo-ai/seo-score)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hainrixz/claude-seo-ai/seo-score"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hainrixz/claude-seo-ai/seo-score/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hainrixz/claude-seo-ai/seo-score"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hainrixz/claude-seo-ai/seo-score.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.00759 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00380 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
seo-score scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 30 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
seo-score
Turns findings (conforming to schema/finding.schema.json) into the two scores. Full model in references/scoring-model.md — follow it exactly.
Steps
- Group findings by the category each module maps to, per score. A finding contributes only to the score(s) in
expected_impact.axis(search,ai, orboth). - Category value =
100 × Σ(status_factor × severity for scored findings) / Σ(severity), wherestatus_factor: pass 1.0, warn 0.5, fail 0.0. Excludeneeds_apiandnot_applicablefrom both sums. - Active weights: drop conditional categories (e-commerce/local/international) whose modules produced no findings; re-normalize remaining weights to sum to their active total.
- Score =
Σ(category_value × weight) / Σ(active weight)for each of Search SEO and AI Visibility. - Severity gating: if any finding has
severity: 5andstatus: fail, cap the affected score at 40 and setcapped: true. - Assign bands (A≥90, B≥80, C≥70, D≥60, F<60) and a one-line interpretation from the Search×AI quadrant.
6b. Coverage floor: report
coverage(the % of the axis's always-on weight that carried a scored finding). Below 50% the axis comes backprovisional: truewithstate: "partial"— quote the band and the coverage figure together, never the letter on its own. - M21 (AI discovery & agent endpoints — llms.txt, agents.md, UCP, agentic sitemap) weight is 0 — report it, never let it move the AI score.
Determinism
Prefer node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/score.mjs" --run <run-dir> (it reads <run-dir>/findings.json) or --findings <path> for a bare findings file, adding --vertical a,b, --multilingual and --environment production|preview|staging|local when the file carries no run context, so the number is reproducible and CI-checkable. --run takes a path, never the word latest: the score command resolves latest[:host] from <root>/<host>/latest.json first and passes the directory. If Node is unavailable, compute by hand following the same formula and note the fallback. Either way the math must match references/scoring-model.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +1 lines 31e89cb00f40
- 6d ago Changed · +1 lines 4004999679a8
- 12d ago First seen · 28 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 4a72d2959665
seo-score is a skill published in the GitHub repository Hainrixz/claude-seo-ai (59 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 759 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
linkedin-post
Draft a daily LinkedIn post for S M Moshiur Rahman about business development, grounded in a real problem he hit that day and real numbers from OmniRank. Use when he says "linkedin post", "today's post", "draft a post", or describes friction he wants written up.
audit
Use when asked to audit a site's SEO, check AEO or answer-engine readiness, diagnose why a page is not ranking or not being cited by AI, verify structured data, or run pre-deploy discoverability checks on built HTML.
geo-artifacts
Use when asked to generate or fix llms.txt, llms-full.txt or facts.json, make a site citable or ingestible by ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity or Gemini, or publish machine-readable ground truth for AI crawlers.
web-optimization
Audit or generate web content optimized for traditional search (SEO), AI generative answer engines like ChatGPT/Perplexity/Google AI Overviews (GEO), and answer engines / featured snippets / voice (AEO). Use when the user asks to improve a page's ranking or AI-citability, run an SEO/GEO/AEO audit of a URL or file, add…
fire-your-seo-agency
A procedure for improving how a website appears in search engines and how AI answer systems find and cite it. It covers search, answer-engine, generative-AI, and Naver visibility.
ansvisor-aeo-coach-standalone
Standalone (no-MCP) version of the Ansvisor AEO Coach. Use this only when the user's Claude client cannot connect to the Ansvisor MCP server (e.g. claude.ai web without a Connector configured). Fetches live data from the Ansvisor REST API directly with the user's API key via code execution. For clients that support…