Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-extension/appendix-agentic-frameworksnpx skills add hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-extension --skill appendix-agentic-frameworksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-extensionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-extension/appendix-agentic-frameworks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-extension/appendix-agentic-frameworks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-extension/appendix-agentic-frameworks.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00412 | $0.03650 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00206 | $0.01825 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00082 | $0.00730 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00041 | $0.00365 |
Grade A, and why
appendix-agentic-frameworks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to appendix-agentic-frameworks — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 375 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Appendix C - Quick Overview of Agentic Frameworks
Overview
The Agentic Frameworks landscape provides developers with structured tools for building, orchestrating, and deploying AI agents. Each framework operates at a different level of abstraction and optimizes for different design priorities — understanding their trade-offs is essential for building reliable, maintainable agent systems.
This appendix provides a comparative overview of the major frameworks: LangChain, LangGraph, Google ADK, CrewAI, Microsoft AutoGen, LlamaIndex, and Haystack — when to use each, their core abstractions, and key code patterns.
Core Principle: No framework is universally best — choose based on whether your workflow is linear (LangChain), cyclical (LangGraph), team-based (ADK/CrewAI), or data-intensive (LlamaIndex).
Framework Comparison Matrix
| Framework | Core Abstraction | Workflow Type | State Management | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LangChain | Chain (LCEL) | Linear DAG | Stateless per run | Simple pipelines, RAG, extraction |
| LangGraph | Graph of nodes | Cyclical + loops | Explicit, persistent | Complex agents, tool loops, HITL |
| Google ADK | Agent team | Orchestrated multi-agent | Implicit (framework) | Production multi-agent systems |
| CrewAI | Agent + Task + Crew | Sequential/hierarchical | Role-based | Team simulation, research workflows |
| AutoGen | Conversational agents | Conversation-driven | Conversational | Dynamic multi-agent conversations |
| LlamaIndex | Data pipeline | RAG-focused | Index-based | Knowledge-intensive agents, RAG |
| Haystack | Pipeline nodes | Modular search | Search-optimized | Enterprise search, QA systems |
When This Skill Applies
Activate this framework selection guide when:
- Starting a new agent project and choosing the technology stack
- Migrating from one framework to another
- Debugging framework-specific behavior or limitations
- Combining multiple frameworks in a hybrid architecture
- Evaluating build-vs-buy for agentic infrastructure
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 375 lines · 412 tokens per session scan A 1cef80579caf
appendix-agentic-frameworks is a skill published in the GitHub repository hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-extension (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 412 tokens to every session and 3,650 once invoked, about $0.0021 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to appendix-agentic-frameworks, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
prompt engineering
Use this skill when asked to create, refine, analyze, or optimize prompts for Large Language Models (LLMs). This skill ensures adherence to prompt engineering best practices and enforces a rigorous design workflow.
redteam
Expertise in offensive security research, vulnerability analysis, CMS-focused application testing, and red team operations.
redteam-cms
Focused methodology for authorized CMS fingerprinting, component inventory, misconfiguration review, and vulnerability validation.
redteam-exploit-validation
Focused workflow for validating exploitability safely and turning candidate issues into reproducible, bounded proof.
redteam-recon
Focused reconnaissance workflow for authorized security assessments, bug bounty triage, lab targets, and CTF infrastructure.
redteam-reporting
Focused reporting workflow for converting verified red-team work into clear, reproducible assessment artifacts.