Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add halexzd686-cloud/SoloFlow --skill content-writergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/halexzd686-cloud/SoloFlowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/halexzd686-cloud/soloflow/content-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/halexzd686-cloud/soloflow/content-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/halexzd686-cloud/soloflow/content-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/halexzd686-cloud/soloflow/content-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/halexzd686-cloud/soloflow/content-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00790 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00316 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
content-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
深度长文写作 Skill
写作流程
- 破题：用一个反直觉的观点或真实故事开头，3 秒内抓住读者
- 诊断：精准描述读者的痛点——"你是不是也遇到过……"
- 框架：给出一个看问题的新角度，不追求绝对正确，但要有说服力
- 展开：用 3-4 个分段展开框架，每段有一个核心观点 + 案例
- 收尾：一句金句 + 明确的行动建议
质量检查清单
- 标题是否让人想点开？
- 开头 3 秒内是否制造了悬念或反直觉？
- 每个观点是否有具体案例支撑？
- 读起来像不像真人在说话？
- 是否有明确的"读者看完能做什么"？
典型结构
标题：反直觉观点 + 数字
开头（Hook）：一个让人意外的故事或数据
"你可能会觉得……但实际上……"
第一部分：为什么这个问题重要
第二部分：常见的错误认知
第三部分：新的解决框架
第四部分：具体怎么做
结尾：一句金句 + "从今天开始，你可以……"
失败模式
- 如果话题过于宽泛，先缩小到 1 个具体场景
- 如果没有真实数据，诚实说"据我观察"，不要编造
- 如果文章超过 4000 字，检查是否有重复内容
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 75 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 48215dbbbd45
content-writer is a skill published in the GitHub repository halexzd686-cloud/SoloFlow (0 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 790 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
building-agents
Use when building or restructuring an LLM agent — provider adapter, tool calling, structured output, RAG, agent loop, eval gate, cost routing, tracing, MCP server — model-agnostic across OpenAI/Anthropic/Gemini/OSS so a model swap is a config change. NOT vector-store SQL alone (that is postgresdb) or service…
agent-eval
Use when measuring whether an LLM or agent system actually got better and gating merges on it: golden sets, fixing an inflated LLM-as-judge, scoring RAG (faithfulness, contextual recall) or agent trajectories (tool correctness, completion), or picking an eval framework. NOT building the agent loop, tools or RAG…
refine
Persistent prompt strategy learning loop — maintains a committed, evidence-attributed CocoStrategyBook so future CocoBrew sessions inherit proven prompt strategies instead of starting from a blank slate.
browser-qa
Testing web apps through a real browser: reconnaissance before acting, selector discovery, state capture, console errors and screenshot evidence. Use on a web surface end to end, or to reproduce a front-end bug.
code-review
Reviewing code for defects: diff-first reading, severity classification, evidence over inference, finding caps, and terminal verdicts. Use when reviewing a diff, PR, or patch, or auditing someone else's work.
data-analysis
Analysing data rigorously: profile before trust (keys, missingness), reproducible queries, provenance per number, units and sanity checks. Use when exploring datasets, computing metrics, or answering data questions.