Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add halexzd686-cloud/SoloFlow --skill market-researchergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/halexzd686-cloud/SoloFlowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/halexzd686-cloud/soloflow/market-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/halexzd686-cloud/soloflow/market-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/halexzd686-cloud/soloflow/market-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/halexzd686-cloud/soloflow/market-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/halexzd686-cloud/soloflow/market-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00785 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00314 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00157 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
market-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
市场调研 Skill
研究流程
- 定义范围：明确调研的市场边界、时间段、地理范围
- 建立框架：确定分析维度和关键指标
- 收集信息：从多个来源交叉验证
- 分析洞察：找出模式、趋势、异常
- 输出报告：结构化的研究发现和建议
报告结构
# [市场/行业名称] 调研报告
## 1. 执行摘要 (Executive Summary)
- 3-5 个最关键发现
- 核心建议
## 2. 市场概况
- 市场规模（当前 + 预测增长）
- 市场阶段（导入期/成长期/成熟期/衰退期）
- 关键驱动因素
## 3. 竞争格局
- 主要玩家及市场份额
- 竞争维度对比（产品/价格/渠道/品牌）
- 竞争态势（红海/蓝海/寡头/分散）
## 4. 趋势与变革
- 技术趋势
- 用户行为变化
- 政策/监管影响
## 5. 风险与不确定性
- 已知风险
- 潜在黑天鹅
## 6. 建议与行动计划
- 短期（0-6 个月）
- 中期（6-18 个月）
- 长期（18 个月+）
质量检查清单
- 市场规模有数据支撑（至少标注估算方法）
- 竞争格局包含至少 3 家主要公司
- 每个风险都有对应缓解策略
- 建议是可执行的具体行动，不是空泛的方向
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 82 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 117c3115906f
market-researcher is a skill published in the GitHub repository halexzd686-cloud/SoloFlow (0 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 785 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
Workspace Data Analyst
Analyze CSV files in the workspace and summarize insights.
building-agents
Use when building or restructuring an LLM agent — provider adapter, tool calling, structured output, RAG, agent loop, eval gate, cost routing, tracing, MCP server — model-agnostic across OpenAI/Anthropic/Gemini/OSS so a model swap is a config change. NOT vector-store SQL alone (that is postgresdb) or service…
agent-eval
Use when measuring whether an LLM or agent system actually got better and gating merges on it: golden sets, fixing an inflated LLM-as-judge, scoring RAG (faithfulness, contextual recall) or agent trajectories (tool correctness, completion), or picking an eval framework. NOT building the agent loop, tools or RAG…
refine
Persistent prompt strategy learning loop — maintains a committed, evidence-attributed CocoStrategyBook so future CocoBrew sessions inherit proven prompt strategies instead of starting from a blank slate.
browser-qa
Testing web apps through a real browser: reconnaissance before acting, selector discovery, state capture, console errors and screenshot evidence. Use on a web surface end to end, or to reproduce a front-end bug.
code-review
Reviewing code for defects: diff-first reading, severity classification, evidence over inference, finding caps, and terminal verdicts. Use when reviewing a diff, PR, or patch, or auditing someone else's work.