Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hamelsmu/evals-skills --skill write-judge-promptgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamelsmu/evals-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamelsmu/evals-skills/write-judge-prompt)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamelsmu/evals-skills/write-judge-prompt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hamelsmu/evals-skills/write-judge-prompt/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamelsmu/evals-skills/write-judge-prompt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hamelsmu/evals-skills/write-judge-prompt.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.01608 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00804 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00322 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00161 |
Grade A, and why
write-judge-prompt scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- write-judge-prompt — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Write LLM-as-Judge Prompt
Design a binary Pass/Fail LLM-as-Judge evaluator for one specific failure mode. Each judge checks exactly one thing.
Prerequisites
- Error analysis is complete. The failure mode is identified.
- You have human-labeled traces for this failure mode (at least 20 Pass and 20 Fail examples).
- A code-based evaluator cannot check this failure mode. Exhaust code-based options before reaching for a judge — many failure modes that seem subjective reduce to keyword checks, regex, or API calls when you understand the domain. Example: detecting whether an AI interviewing coach suggests "general" questions (asking about typical behavior instead of a specific past event) seems to require semantic understanding, but in practice a keyword check for words like "usually," "typical," and "normally" could work quite well.
The Four Components
Every judge prompt requires exactly four components:
1. Task and Evaluation Criterion
State what the judge evaluates. One failure mode per judge.
You are an evaluator assessing whether a real estate assistant's email
uses the appropriate tone for the client's persona.
Not: "Evaluate whether the email is good" or "Rate the email quality from 1-5."
2. Pass/Fail Definitions
Outcomes are strictly binary: Pass or Fail. No Likert scales, no letter grades, no partial credit. Define exactly what constitutes Pass and Fail. These definitions come from your error analysis failure mode descriptions.
## Definitions
PASS: The email matches the expected communication style for the client persona:
- Luxury Buyers: formal language, emphasis on exclusive features, premium
market positioning, no casual slang
- First-Time Homebuyers: warm and encouraging tone, educational explanations,
avoids jargon, patient and supportive
- Investors: data-driven language, ROI-focused, market analytics, concise
and professional
FAIL: The email uses a tone mismatched to the client persona. Examples:
- Using casual slang ("hey, check out this pad!") for a luxury buyer
- Using heavy financial jargon for a first-time homebuyer
- Using overly emotional language for an investor
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 145 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A aa28d26c731e
write-judge-prompt is a skill published in the GitHub repository hamelsmu/evals-skills (1,664 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 1,608 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
llm-app-patterns
Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications. Covers RAG pipelines, agent architectures, prompt IDEs, and LLMOps monitoring. Use when designing AI applications, implementing RAG, building agents, or setting up LLM observability.
prompt-optimization
Improve a prompt on the evaluations workbench through a measured loop. Score the baseline first, then duplicate the target column, form a hypothesis from failing rows, edit the copy's prompt draft, run, compare pass rate and cost, and repeat until the numbers hold. Use when the user asks to optimize or improve a…
enhance-prompt
Transforms vague UI ideas into polished, Stitch-optimized prompts. Enhances specificity, adds UI/UX keywords, injects design system context, and structures output for better generation results.
prompt-engineer
Writes, refactors, and evaluates prompts for LLMs — generating optimized prompt templates, structured output schemas, evaluation rubrics, and test suites. Use when designing prompts for new LLM applications, refactoring existing prompts for better accuracy or token efficiency, implementing chain-of-thought or few-shot…
seedance-vocab-en
This skill should be used when an English Seedance 2.0 prompt needs clearer production wording, less generic prose, or precise vocabulary for camera, lighting, motion, VFX, audio, and constraints. Route blocked prompts through seedance-filter for context and boundary review.
ideogram4
Prompting patterns for Ideogram 4 text-to-image — best-in-class in-image text rendering and exact color/layout control via structured JSON captions. Use when generating images that need legible on-image text (title cards, thumbnails, logos, signage, CTAs), precise brand colors, or controlled spatial layout. Triggers…