Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hamr0/agentic-toolkit/test-driven-developmentnpx skills add hamr0/agentic-toolkit --skill test-driven-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamr0/agentic-toolkitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00042 | $0.02380 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01190 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00476 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00238 |
Grade A, and why
test-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to test-driven-development — 9 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 365 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test-Driven Development (TDD)
Overview
Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass.
Core principle: If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.
Violating the letter of the rules is violating the spirit of the rules.
When to Use
Always:
- New features
- Bug fixes
- Refactoring
- Behavior changes
Exceptions (ask your human partner):
- Throwaway prototypes
- Generated code
- Configuration files
Thinking "skip TDD just this once"? Stop. That's rationalization.
The Iron Law
NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST
Write code before the test? Delete it. Start over.
No exceptions:
- Don't keep it as "reference"
- Don't "adapt" it while writing tests
- Don't look at it
- Delete means delete
Implement fresh from tests. Period.
Red-Green-Refactor
digraph tdd_cycle {
rankdir=LR;
red [label="RED\nWrite failing test", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ffcccc"];
verify_red [label="Verify fails\ncorrectly", shape=diamond];
green [label="GREEN\nMinimal code", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ccffcc"];
verify_green [label="Verify passes\nAll green", shape=diamond];
refactor [label="REFACTOR\nClean up", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ccccff"];
next [label="Next", shape=ellipse];
red -> verify_red;
verify_red -> green [label="yes"];
verify_red -> red [label="wrong\nfailure"];
green -> verify_green;
verify_green -> refactor [label="yes"];
verify_green -> green [label="no"];
refactor -> verify_green [label="stay\ngreen"];
verify_green -> next;
next -> red;
}
RED - Write Failing Test
Write one minimal test showing what should happen.
const result = await retryOperation(operation);
expect(result).toBe('success'); expect(attempts).toBe(3); });
Clear name, tests real behavior, one thing
</Good>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 365 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A a5ebe82af148
test-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository hamr0/agentic-toolkit (22 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 2,380 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to test-driven-development, differing in 9 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
create_profile_style_skill
【META SKILL】分析当前剪辑逻辑与风格，总结并生成一个新的可复用 Skill 文件，存入剪辑技能库。Analyze the current editing logic and style, summarize and generate a new reusable Skill file, and store it in the editing skill library.
Paper Writing Workflow
Workflow phases for paper-writing tasks: triage, material inventory, research question, literature review, paper outline, data analysis summary, figure storyline, reader testing, and finalize packet. Each phase is a short contract — read the relevant rows for the current task only.
company-product-context
Compiles comprehensive company product context from PDF documents, web research, and industry knowledge.
deep-researcher
Performs comprehensive, multi-layered research on any topic with structured analysis and synthesis of information from multiple sources.
codebase-context-extractor
This skill provides a comprehensive context extraction system for large codebases. It intelligently analyzes code structure, dependencies, and relationships to extract relevant context for understanding, debugging, or modifying code.
llmtornado-tutorial-generator
Generates comprehensive code tutorials on LlmTornado API formatted for Medium publication with examples, explanations, and best practices.