Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hamr0/liteagents/shipnpx skills add hamr0/liteagents --skill shipgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamr0/liteagentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamr0/liteagents/ship)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamr0/liteagents/ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hamr0/liteagents/ship.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00813 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00407 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00163 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
ship scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mechanical pre-deploy / pre-merge gate. Every item here is answerable by
running a command and reading its exit code — no code judgment. Code
judgment belongs to /branch-review (which runs /security in full as its
second stage); this gate does not duplicate it.
Detect the stack first (look for package.json,
pyproject.toml/setup.cfg, go.mod, Cargo.toml, Makefile) and run only
the checks that actually exist — never assume a script (lint, build,
migrate) is present.
Evidence rule
Report each item as pass / fail / N/A, and record the exact command and
its exit code. A check you did not run is a fail, never a pass. N/A
requires a stated reason ("no build script in package.json") — N/A must
never stand in for "didn't get to it."
Capture the exit code of the command itself, never of a pipeline. Run the
bare command, then read $? on the next line:
node "$f" > /tmp/out 2>&1; e=$?
$? after a pipe is the last element's status, so the common shape
out=$(cmd 2>&1 | tail -1); echo "exit=$?" reports tail's success — 0 —
for a suite that exited 2. Reproduced: a check printing "exit 2:
prerequisites missing" was recorded as a pass by exactly that loop. Nor does
${PIPESTATUS[0]} rescue it inside a command substitution; it is empty by
the time you read it. This is the rule the whole gate rests on, and the
piped form is the natural way to write a multi-suite loop, so it fails
silently and in the unsafe direction.
Checklist
- Tests pass — run the project's real test command (
npm test,pytest,go test ./...,cargo test,make test). - Lint / format clean — only if a linter or formatter is configured.
- Build succeeds — only if the project has a build step.
- No debug leftovers — stray
console.log/print/debugger/dbg!/ commented-out blocks / blockerTODOs in the changed files. - No hardcoded secrets — grep the diff for keys, tokens, credentials;
confirm
.envis gitignored and only a value-less.env.exampleis tracked. This is the one check/securityalso makes, kept deliberately: it is a grep with a binary answer, and a leaked key is the one failure worth catching twice. - Migrations ready — only if the project has a schema / migrations: they apply cleanly and are ordered.
- Docs & config in sync —
.env.example, README, and any PRD / context doc updated for new config or new usage. - Clean tree, correct branch, in sync with
origin— and never onmain.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 60 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A ed1bbd7925a7
ship is a skill published in the GitHub repository hamr0/liteagents (22 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 813 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
azure-devtest-labs
Expert knowledge for Azure DevTest Labs development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when managing lab VM images, ARM/CI-CD automation, RBAC/Key Vault security…
winui-ui-testing
Automated UI testing for Windows desktop apps — generate a batch test script with the winapp ui UI Automation harness, run all tests in one pass, read results. Covers element assertions, interactions, value checking (TextBox, ComboBox, ToggleSwitch), keyboard shortcuts and typing (send-keys), hover, drag-and-drop…
beevibe-verify-pr
CI verification before marking a PR-bearing task done. Use BEFORE calling mcpbeevibeupdateprogress(done) on any session whose deliverable is a pull request — including the first dispatch (you opened the PR with gh pr create) and any revision dispatch (you pushed new commits to an existing PR). Watches the PR's…
yida-formula-evaluate
静态检查宜搭公式语法、字段引用和常见风险。适用于用户要求「检查公式」「公式是否能用」「定位公式报错」时。.
quality-ci
Set up or refine open-source .NET code-quality gates for CI: formatting, .editorconfig, SDK analyzers, third-party analyzers, coverage, mutation testing, architecture tests, and security scanning. USE FOR: .NET quality gates in CI; analyzer, coverage, mutation, and architecture-test choices; standardizing…
devops-pipeline
Configure pre-commit hooks and lean GitHub Actions for shift-left quality assurance. Use when adding or auditing CI/CD to maximize local test coverage and minimize CI cost. Skip for Terraform/K8s, deployment pipelines, or non-GitHub CI providers.