Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hamsurang/kit --skill skill-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamsurang/kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamsurang/kit/skill-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamsurang/kit/skill-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hamsurang/kit/skill-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamsurang/kit/skill-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hamsurang/kit/skill-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00553 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00221 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
skill-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Skill Review
Reviews a SKILL.md against established best practices and outputs a structured pass/fail report with prioritized recommendations.
Contents
Locating the Target Skill
With explicit path: Use the provided path directly (supports both SKILL.md files and plugin directories).
Without path — search in this order:
- Current directory:
./SKILL.md - Plugin skill dirs:
./plugins/*/skills/*/SKILL.md - Prompt the user if multiple matches found
Review Workflow
- Read
SKILL.mdand any files inreferences/that it links to - Run each check in
references/checklist.md— assign PASS ✅, WARNING ⚠️, or ERROR ❌ - Output the structured report below
Be educational, not just a linter — include a brief explanation of why each finding matters.
Output Format
## Skill Review: [skill-name]
### Summary
**Status:** PASS / NEEDS WORK / FAIL
**Score:** N/N checks passed | N warnings | N errors
### ✅ Passed (N)
- [Check description]
- ...
### ⚠️ Warnings (N)
- **[Check name]**: [finding] — [brief explanation of why it matters]
- ...
### ❌ Errors (N)
- **[Check name]**: [finding] — [why it must be fixed before publishing]
- ...
### 📋 Prioritized Recommendations
1. [Most critical fix first]
2. ...
Severity Definitions
| Severity | Meaning |
|---|---|
| ❌ Error | Violates a spec requirement. Must fix before publishing. |
| ⚠️ Warning | Best practice violation. Should fix for quality. |
| ✅ Pass | Meets the standard. |
Full Rubric
See references/checklist.md for all checks organized by category (frontmatter, description quality, naming, content, structure, scripts, plugin manifest).
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 77 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 8ac2025266e0
skill-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository hamsurang/kit (19 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 553 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…