Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hamzabellouch/agent-skills --skill academic-academic-paper-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamzabellouch/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/academic-academic-paper-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/academic-academic-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/academic-academic-paper-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/academic-academic-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/academic-academic-paper-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00187 | $0.06423 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00093 | $0.03211 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01285 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00642 |
Grade A, and why
academic-paper-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 451 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Academic Paper Reviewer v1.10.0 — Multi-Perspective Academic Paper Review Agent Team
Simulates a complete international journal peer review process: automatically identifies the paper's field, dynamically configures 5 reviewers (Editor-in-Chief + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) who review from four non-overlapping perspectives — methodology, domain expertise, cross-disciplinary viewpoints, and core argument challenges — ultimately producing a structured Editorial Decision and Revision Roadmap.
v1.1 Improvements:
- Added Devil's Advocate Reviewer — specifically challenges core arguments, detects logical fallacies, and identifies the strongest counter-arguments
- Added
re-reviewmode — verification review, focused on checking whether revisions address the review comments - Expanded review team from 4 to 5 members
Routing discipline (v3.9.2): see
.claude/CLAUDE.md"Routing Discipline (v3.9.2)" +shared/references/intent_clarification_protocol.mdfor cross-skill routing rules. This skill assumes routing has already settled — ambiguous cross-phase materials should have been clarified upstream.
Quick Start
Simplest command:
Review this paper: [paste paper or provide file]
Output:
- Automatically identifies the paper's field and methodology type
- Dynamically configures the specific identities and expertise of 5 reviewers
- 5 independent review reports (each from a different perspective)
- 1 Editorial Decision Letter + Revision Roadmap
Trigger Conditions
Trigger Keywords
English: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy
한국어: 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 원고 심사, 심사 보고서, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정, 심사 정확도 측정
繁體中文: 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準
Non-Trigger Scenarios
| Scenario | Skill to Use |
|---|---|
| Need to write a paper (not review) | academic-paper |
| Need in-depth investigation of a research topic | deep-research |
| Need to revise a paper (already have review comments) | academic-paper (revision mode) |
What ships with it
25 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent.md 26 KB
- agents/domain_reviewer_agent.md 17 KB
- agents/editorial_synthesizer_agent.md 31 KB
- agents/eic_agent.md 12 KB
- agents/field_analyst_agent.md 9.2 KB
- agents/methodology_reviewer_agent.md 16 KB
- agents/perspective_reviewer_agent.md 17 KB
- examples/hei_paper_review_example.md 26 KB
- examples/interdisciplinary_review_example.md 19 KB
- examples/subclaim_decomposition_example.md 6.0 KB
- references/calibration_mode_protocol.md 19 KB
- references/changelog.md 976 B
- references/editorial_decision_standards.md 9.0 KB
- references/guided_mode_protocol.md 1.9 KB
- references/integration_guide.md 680 B
- references/quality_rubrics.md 7.5 KB
- references/re_review_mode_protocol.md 14 KB
- references/review_criteria_framework.md 9.9 KB
- references/review_quality_thinking.md 2.9 KB
- references/sprint_contract_protocol.md 14 KB
- references/statistical_reporting_standards.md 22 KB
- references/top_journals_by_field.md 13 KB
- templates/editorial_decision_template.md 7.4 KB
- templates/peer_review_report_template.md 7.3 KB
- templates/revision_response_template.md 6.9 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 451 lines · 187 tokens per session scan A d24a8ba6d98d
academic-paper-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository hamzabellouch/agent-skills (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 187 tokens to every session and 6,423 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
spec-implement
Orchestrate parallel implementation of a feature specification by dispatching coder agents batch-by-batch with code review gates between batches. Use this skill when the user says "implement this feature", "start implementing", "run the spec", "execute the plan", "continue implementing", or wants to begin coding a…
spec-create
Create a structured feature specification with self-contained task files organized into parallel execution batches. Use this skill when the user says "create a spec", "plan this feature", "write up an implementation plan", "break this into tasks", or after any planning conversation where the user wants to capture…
spec-ship
Push the current branch to GitHub and create a pull request. Use this skill when the user says "ship it", "ship this", "push to github", "create a pr", "open a pull request", "send for review", "get this reviewed", or wants to push their work and open a PR. Also use when the user says "/spec-ship" (or their host's…
spec-checkpoint
Create a comprehensive checkpoint commit with detailed analysis of all changes. Use this skill when the user says "checkpoint", "commit everything", "save my progress", "create a commit", or wants to stage and commit all current changes with a well-crafted message. Also use when the user says "/spec-checkpoint" (or…
generative-seo
Run an evidence-based SEO + GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) program for ANY website or product codebase — auditing technical SEO, writing or retrofitting content so it gets cited by ChatGPT/Perplexity/AI Overviews, tracking AI-citation visibility, refreshing competitor research, and drafting distribution posts.…
spec-verify
Verify a completed feature spec by driving the real running app — not just lint/typecheck/build — and checking off every acceptance criterion from its specs/{feature}/ folder one by one. Use this after /spec-implement finishes a spec, when the user says "test this end to end", "verify this feature actually works"…