Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hamzabellouch/agent-skills --skill academic-academic-paper-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamzabellouch/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/academic-academic-paper-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/academic-academic-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/academic-academic-paper-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/academic-academic-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/academic-academic-paper-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00187 | $0.06423 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00075 | $0.02569 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.01285 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00642 |
Grade A, and why
academic-paper-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 451 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Academic Paper Reviewer v1.10.0 — Multi-Perspective Academic Paper Review Agent Team
Simulates a complete international journal peer review process: automatically identifies the paper's field, dynamically configures 5 reviewers (Editor-in-Chief + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) who review from four non-overlapping perspectives — methodology, domain expertise, cross-disciplinary viewpoints, and core argument challenges — ultimately producing a structured Editorial Decision and Revision Roadmap.
v1.1 Improvements:
- Added Devil's Advocate Reviewer — specifically challenges core arguments, detects logical fallacies, and identifies the strongest counter-arguments
- Added
re-reviewmode — verification review, focused on checking whether revisions address the review comments - Expanded review team from 4 to 5 members
Routing discipline (v3.9.2): see
.claude/CLAUDE.md"Routing Discipline (v3.9.2)" +shared/references/intent_clarification_protocol.mdfor cross-skill routing rules. This skill assumes routing has already settled — ambiguous cross-phase materials should have been clarified upstream.
Quick Start
Simplest command:
Review this paper: [paste paper or provide file]
Output:
- Automatically identifies the paper's field and methodology type
- Dynamically configures the specific identities and expertise of 5 reviewers
- 5 independent review reports (each from a different perspective)
- 1 Editorial Decision Letter + Revision Roadmap
Trigger Conditions
Trigger Keywords
English: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy
한국어: 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 원고 심사, 심사 보고서, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정, 심사 정확도 측정
繁體中文: 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準
Non-Trigger Scenarios
| Scenario | Skill to Use |
|---|---|
| Need to write a paper (not review) | academic-paper |
| Need in-depth investigation of a research topic | deep-research |
| Need to revise a paper (already have review comments) | academic-paper (revision mode) |
What ships with it
25 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent.md 26 KB
- agents/domain_reviewer_agent.md 17 KB
- agents/editorial_synthesizer_agent.md 31 KB
- agents/eic_agent.md 12 KB
- agents/field_analyst_agent.md 9.2 KB
- agents/methodology_reviewer_agent.md 16 KB
- agents/perspective_reviewer_agent.md 17 KB
- examples/hei_paper_review_example.md 26 KB
- examples/interdisciplinary_review_example.md 19 KB
- examples/subclaim_decomposition_example.md 6.0 KB
- references/calibration_mode_protocol.md 19 KB
- references/changelog.md 976 B
- references/editorial_decision_standards.md 9.0 KB
- references/guided_mode_protocol.md 1.9 KB
- references/integration_guide.md 680 B
- references/quality_rubrics.md 7.5 KB
- references/re_review_mode_protocol.md 14 KB
- references/review_criteria_framework.md 9.9 KB
- references/review_quality_thinking.md 2.9 KB
- references/sprint_contract_protocol.md 14 KB
- references/statistical_reporting_standards.md 22 KB
- references/top_journals_by_field.md 13 KB
- templates/editorial_decision_template.md 7.4 KB
- templates/peer_review_report_template.md 7.3 KB
- templates/revision_response_template.md 6.9 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 451 lines · 187 tokens per session scan A d24a8ba6d98d
academic-paper-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository hamzabellouch/agent-skills (8 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 187 tokens to every session and 6,423 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
academic-paper-reviewer compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| academic-paper-reviewerhamzabellouch/agent-skills | Skill | 8 | 26d ago | MIT | A | 187 | Claude Code |
| spec-investigatebenjaminthomas/spec-driven-dev | Skill | 2 | today | MIT | A | 218 | Claude Code |
| spec-implementbenjaminthomas/spec-driven-dev | Skill | 2 | today | MIT | A | 137 | Claude Code |
| spec-shipbenjaminthomas/spec-driven-dev | Skill | 2 | today | MIT | A | 119 | Claude Code |
| spec-setupbenjaminthomas/spec-driven-dev | Skill | 2 | today | MIT | A | 214 | Claude Code |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 135k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 100k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |