PuPu: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/gitnexus-refactoring/SKILL.md

gitnexus-refactoring is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from haoxiang-xu/PuPu. It costs 53 tokens per session (1,545 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of gitnexus-refactoring, Apache-2.0.

A GitNexus workflow for safely changing the structure of a codebase, such as renaming, extracting, splitting, moving, or restructuring code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to plan and carry out safe renames, module extraction, service splits, file moves, and other code-organisation changes.
Why use it?
It helps identify affected code before edits and uses a preview step to confirm which repository and files will be changed. A repository is the project folder containing its code and history.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is haoxiang-xu/PuPu's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on PuPu itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything PuPu configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to haoxiang-xu/PuPu. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haoxiang-xu/PuPu/main/.agents/skills/gitnexus-refactoring/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/haoxiang-xu/PuPu

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gitnexus-refactoring

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/haoxiang-xu/pupu/gitnexus-refactoring/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/haoxiang-xu/pupu/gitnexus-refactoring)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/haoxiang-xu/pupu/gitnexus-refactoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/haoxiang-xu/pupu/gitnexus-refactoring/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for gitnexus-refactoring

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/haoxiang-xu/pupu/gitnexus-refactoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/haoxiang-xu/pupu/gitnexus-refactoring.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 53 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,545 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00053 $0.01545
Opus 5.5 $0.00021 $0.00618
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00309
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00154

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 2c52bb42fe71, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gitnexus-refactoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to gitnexus-refactoring — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/gitnexus-refactoring/SKILL.md · 165 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 165 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Refactoring with GitNexus

When to Use

  • "Rename this function safely"
  • "Extract this into a module"
  • "Split this service"
  • "Move this to a new file"
  • Any task involving renaming, extracting, splitting, or restructuring code

Bind the repository first

Refactoring writes to disk. rename with dry_run: false edits files in whichever repository was resolved, so binding identity here is a safety gate, not bookkeeping.

Call list_repos {} before the first tool call. With one indexed repository, use the examples below as written. With more than one, pass repo on every call: an omitted repo normally errors, but under an MCP policy with a configured default it resolves to that default silently. If you cannot tell which repository is meant, stop and ask. Never run rename with dry_run: false until the preview in the same bound repository has been reviewed — its returned file_path values show which checkout is about to be written, so read them as a confirmation of identity.

list_repos is paginated, so page with offset: pagination.nextOffset until hasMore is false before concluding a repository is absent.

detect_changes takes worktree when you are editing a linked worktree the MCP server was not launched from; otherwise git diff runs in the wrong checkout and reports nothing changed, which reads as a verified refactor.

Workflow

0. list_repos {}                                  → Bind repo (and worktree)
1. impact({target: "X", direction: "upstream"})  → Map all dependents
2. query({search_query: "X"})                            → Find execution flows involving X
3. context({name: "X"})                           → See all incoming/outgoing refs
4. Plan update order: interfaces → implementations → callers → tests

If "Index is stale" → run node .gitnexus/run.cjs analyze in terminal.

Checklists

Rename Symbol

- [ ] list_repos {} — bind repo; explicit repo when >1 indexed, ask if ambiguous
- [ ] rename({symbol_name: "oldName", new_name: "newName", dry_run: true}) — preview all edits
- [ ] Confirm the previewed file paths are in the bound repository/worktree
- [ ] Review graph edits (high confidence) and text_search edits (review carefully)
- [ ] If satisfied: rename({..., dry_run: false}) — apply edits
- [ ] detect_changes() — verify only expected files changed
- [ ] Run tests for affected processes

Read the full file on GitHub · 165 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 165 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 2c52bb42fe71

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gitnexus-refactoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository haoxiang-xu/PuPu (36 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,545 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to gitnexus-refactoring, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

sync-bridge

Reviews and guides Chromium Sync Model API (DataTypeSyncBridge) implementations, including DataTypeStore persistence and forwards/backwards compatibility for sync specifics. Use when implementing or reviewing a DataTypeSyncBridge subclass, DataTypeStore usage, sync metadata persistence, conflict resolution, or…

chromium/chromium · 109 tokens

sync-model-processor

Reviews changes to Chromium Sync model internals in components/sync/model/, including ClientTagBasedDataTypeProcessor, ClientTagBasedRemoteUpdateHandler, ProcessorEntity, ProcessorEntityMetadata, and ProcessorEntityTracker. Use when modifying or reviewing processor state transitions, entity metadata tracking, conflict…

chromium/chromium · 98 tokens

adversarial-reviewer

Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…

emdash-cms/emdash · 72 tokens

gsd-ns-review

Invoke this Pi skill with /skill:gsd-ns-review.

open-gsd/gsd-core · 16 tokens

gitnexus

A code-graph analysis add-on for examining an existing codebase, including symbols, call paths, execution flows, and effects across repositories. It can query GitNexus through its command-line or MCP interfaces.

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins · 58 tokens

issue

Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the…

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace · 115 tokens