Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add haposoft/cafekit --skill askgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/haposoft/cafekitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/haposoft/cafekit/ask)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/haposoft/cafekit/ask"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/haposoft/cafekit/ask/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/haposoft/cafekit/ask"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/haposoft/cafekit/ask.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.01342 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00537 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00268 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
cf:ask scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 105 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 7899b2912851
cf:ask is a skill published in the GitHub repository haposoft/cafekit (54 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 1,342 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-23.
Other skills, from other repositories
mira-annotation-review
Review MIRA annotations in Markdown documents for semantic correctness, Markdown dialect validity, preservation, and relation integrity. Use for md, smd, qmd, and myst files containing research objects such as claims, evidence, questions, protocols, requests, typed claims, ids, and relations. Produces actionable…
mira-annotation
Annotate Markdown documents with MIRA research objects and source-local relations. Use for md, smd, qmd, and myst files when identifying claims, evidence, questions, protocols, requests, typed claims, and relation attributes while preserving the original Markdown flavor and author wording. Not for general copyediting…
swiss-knife
Use when checking saved presets, reporting token usage, preparing HTML deliverables or verifying academic evidence. Also routes to retained MiniMax, Xiaomi MiMo and Zhipu provider references.
ftd
Use for ordinary authorised change — the default lane once the decisor has ruled out a question and not selected the chain. Keeps one feature document per feature in 02-DOCS holding intent, scope, checklist, evidence and next step, checks tasks off only against observed proof, and asks whether to branch before the…
contract
Outcome-driven Cortex function development — declares a behavioral contract before generation begins, enforces evidence-tiered proof before $ship, and defends against the self-oracle evaluation failure mode.
academic-research
Use when drafting citation-bearing academic writing or revising empirical claims. Nested swiss-knife reference for source verification and keeping manuscript claims anchored to data, not reviewer consensus.