Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/harbor-framework/skillsnpx agentmods add skills/harbor-framework/skills/harbor-adapter-creatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/harbor-framework/skills/harbor-adapter-creator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/harbor-framework/skills/harbor-adapter-creator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/harbor-framework/skills/harbor-adapter-creator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/harbor-framework/skills/harbor-adapter-creator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/harbor-framework/skills/harbor-adapter-creator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00089 | $0.05051 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.02525 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01010 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00505 |
Grade C, and why
harbor-adapter-creator scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Downloads and executes remote codehighSupply chain
curl | sh runs whatever the server returns today, which is not necessarily what it returned when this was reviewed.
apt-get update && apt-get install -y curl curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/0.9.7/install.sh | sh Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
apt-get update && apt-get install -y curl How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 498 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Creating Harbor Benchmark Adapters
Adapters convert external benchmarks (SimpleQA, GAIA, AiderPolyglot, CodePDE, spider2-dbt, etc.) into Harbor's standardized task directory format. Each adapter reads source benchmark data and generates many individual task directories, one per benchmark instance.
When to Use an Adapter vs. Creating Tasks Directly
Use an adapter when:
- You have an existing benchmark dataset with many instances
- Tasks share the same structure but differ in data (questions, code, etc.)
- You want to track evaluation parity with the original benchmark
Create tasks directly when:
- You're authoring original evaluation challenges
- Each task has unique structure and environment
- There are fewer than ~10 tasks
Adapter Directory Structure
adapters/<adapter-id>/
├── adapter.py # Core conversion logic (adapter class)
├── run_adapter.py # CLI entry point
├── run_<adapter-id>.yaml # Job config for oracle and parity experiment runs
├── README.md # Benchmark docs, license, parity, citation
├── parity_experiment.json # Parity tracking results (JSON array)
├── adapter_metadata.json # Adapter metadata (JSON array)
└── template/ # Task template files
├── task.toml
├── instruction.md
├── environment/
│ └── Dockerfile
├── tests/
│ └── test.sh
└── solution/
└── solve.sh
All template files, parity_experiment.json, adapter_metadata.json, and README.md are required. The validator (harbor adapters validate) checks for all of them. The YAML job config is not validated but is expected for parity experiments.
Scaffolding with harbor adapters init
harbor adapters init my-benchmark
The interactive AdapterWizard prompts for:
- Benchmark name -- Vanilla name (e.g., "SWE-bench")
- Adapter ID -- Lowercase, no spaces (e.g.,
swebench) - Class name -- Python class name (auto-derived or overridden, e.g.,
SwebenchAdapter) - Description -- One-line description for the README
- Source URL -- Link to original benchmark paper or repo
- License -- Dataset license for the README
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 498 lines · 89 tokens per session scan C 35873057e257
harbor-adapter-creator is a skill published in the GitHub repository harbor-framework/skills (11 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 5,051 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (downloads and executes remote code, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cli-eval
Create and run evaluation suites, watch live benchmark progress, view scorecards, compare model performance, and integrate eval runs with CI workflows from the CLI.
model-merging
Merge multiple fine-tuned models using mergekit to combine capabilities without retraining. Use when creating specialized models by blending domain-specific expertise (math + coding + chat), improving performance beyond single models, or experimenting rapidly with model variants. Covers SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task…
darwinian-evolver
Evolve prompts/regex/SQL/code with Imbue's evolution loop.
validate
Validate Semantica pipelines, extraction quality, graph schemas, and ontology consistency. Returns structured error/warning checklists. Uses PipelineValidator, PipelineBuilder.validatepipeline(), GraphValidator, and OntologyValidator. Sub-commands: pipeline, step, dependencies, extraction, graph, ontology, performance.
launching-evals
Run, monitor, analyze, and debug LLM evaluations via nemo-evaluator-launcher. Covers running evaluations, checking status and live progress, debugging failed runs, exporting artifacts and logs, and analyzing results. ALWAYS triggers on mentions of running evaluations, checking progress, debugging failed evals…
nemo-automodel-recipe-development
Create and modify NeMo AutoModel training and evaluation recipes, including YAML structure, builders, and execution flow.