ds-look

A visual check of one page against your Design Bible, which is the project's rules for colours, fonts, spacing, and component styles.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a page after a UI change and receive a plain-English report with an annotated image when available.
Why use it?
It shows where a recent interface change does not match those rules, so visual mistakes are easier to spot. It reports problems without changing the code.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/harshii0509/designstack/look
Any agent
npx skills add harshii0509/designStack --skill look
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/harshii0509/designStack

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 52 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,231 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00052 $0.02231
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.01115
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00446
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00223

Measured 2d ago against content hash 8a985fe44175, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ds-look scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

look/SKILL.md · 242 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 242 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Preamble

"../lib/env.sh" "look"

What this skill does

Check if your site actually looks like it should. You point me at a page, I take a screenshot, compare it against your Design Bible (colors, fonts, spacing, brand rules), and give you a plain-English report with an annotated image showing exactly where things are off.

This skill never changes code — it only looks and reports.

This is the single-page check. If the user wants a scan across many pages, route them to /ds-brand. If they want a final pre-launch checklist, route them to /ds-polish.

Step 1 — Load the Design Bible

If DESIGN_BIBLE is yes, read the Bible file fully. Follow the standard extraction protocol in lib/bible-reader.md. Extract:

  • L1 colors (primary, background, text, accent)
  • L1 typography (font families, sizes, weights)
  • L1 spacing scale
  • L1 border radius rules
  • L4 component rules (buttons, cards, forms, nav)
  • Memory Log (recent changes, known intentional decisions)

If DESIGN_BIBLE is no:

"I don't have your design rules yet, so I can't compare this page against your brand rules. I'll still look for layout issues and obvious problems. Want me to set up your Design Bible first? Run /ds-context — it takes 5 minutes and makes every future check much smarter."

Continue the check either way.

Step 2 — Get the URL

Ask the user:

"What page should I check? Give me the URL — e.g. http://localhost:3000 or https://your-site.com/dashboard. If you have a specific part in mind (like the signup flow or the pricing page), tell me that too."

If the user already mentioned a URL in the conversation, use that and confirm:

"I'll check [URL] — is that the right page?"

Step 3 — Take a screenshot (if browse available)

If BROWSE is not NOT_FOUND:

"../lib/visual-audit.sh" screenshot "<URL>" "look" "before"
$B text

If the URL is not reachable, run and show the output of:

"../lib/visual-audit.sh" not_running

Do not continue until the user confirms the project is running.

Read the full file on GitHub · 242 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 242 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 8a985fe44175

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ds-look is a skill published in the GitHub repository harshii0509/designStack (13 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 2,231 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.