Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to harumiWeb/exstruct. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/harumiWeb/exstruct/main/.agents/skills/adr-linter/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/harumiWeb/exstructWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/harumiweb/exstruct/adr-linter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/harumiweb/exstruct/adr-linter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/harumiweb/exstruct/adr-linter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/harumiweb/exstruct/adr-linter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/harumiweb/exstruct/adr-linter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00302 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00121 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
adr-linter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
ADR Linter
Review the ADR as a decision record, not as prose polish.
Read
dev-docs/agents/adr-governance.mddev-docs/agents/adr-workflow.mddev-docs/adr/template.md- Related ADRs if the draft mentions supersede or overlap
Workflow
- Validate the status value.
- Check that the ADR has
状態,背景,決定,影響,根拠,Supersedes, andSuperseded by. - Verify that
根拠contains concreteTests,Code, orRelated specs. - Check that consequences include tradeoffs, not only benefits.
- If supersede or replacement is claimed, verify the referenced ADR links are present and consistent.
Output Contract
Return findings first, ordered by severity.
high: contract hole, missing decision, invalid status, missing supersede linkagemedium: weak context, weak evidence, one-sided consequenceslow: clarity or consistency issues
If no findings exist, say that explicitly and mention any residual review risk.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 555d1fcf814d
adr-linter is a skill published in the GitHub repository harumiWeb/exstruct (204 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed BSD-3-Clause. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 302 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
visual-aspect-analyzer
Run this as the FINAL review step once you have finished a UI change you can load in a browser — it is the visual-regression gate, run once at the end (not after every edit), and the change is not done until it reports score: 100. It drives a real browser over the page, auto-detects its relevant elements (no…
summarize-changes
Summarizes uncommitted changes and flags anything risky.
review-change
Review one change (a pull request, a diff, a branch) the way the factory's review stage does, grounded in the warranting library, and end with a plain-words sign-off sheet for someone who doesn't read code. Use when someone asks to review a change before it merges, asks whether they can sign a change off, or pastes a…
factory
Run a software change through the factory harness (spec, triage, locked tests, guarded build, deterministic gates, blind Claude + Codex review, warranty pack) and present the pack to the accountable person. Use when the user asks to build, gate, review or warrant a change with the factory, to resume a blocked factory…
weekly-review
How this household runs its Sunday weekly review.
review-agent
Perform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review instructions.