Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hashgraph-online/hol-cigar/whynpx skills add hashgraph-online/hol-cigar --skill whygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hashgraph-online/hol-cigarWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/hol-cigar/why)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/hol-cigar/why"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hashgraph-online/hol-cigar/why.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00178 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00089 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00036 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
why scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Use CIGAR's context_explain MCP tool for the requested bundle, source, or current session context. If the user gives no identifier, explain the most recent injection recorded by the hook.
Report the source or snapshot, semantic bundle, authority lane, expiry, degradation state, evidence references, and separate physical, cache-write, and cache-read token counts. Distinguish facts present in the bundle from your own inference. Keep the answer bounded and paginate through handles only when the user asks for more detail.
Do not inspect provider transcripts or private Claude files. If the MCP server is unavailable, say that provenance is temporarily unavailable; do not invent it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 12 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 95c73b11cddc
why is a skill published in the GitHub repository hashgraph-online/hol-cigar (8 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 178 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
decision
Full decision lifecycle in Semantica � record, query, find precedents (hybrid/advanced), analyze influence, explain, insights dashboard, list, and record exceptions. Uses AgentContext, ContextGraph, DecisionQuery, CausalChainAnalyzer, DecisionRecorder.
dd-synthesis
Synthesize findings from multiple specialist agents into a coherent investment recommendation. Use when combining reports from 9+ specialist agents into a single decision document.
dd-report-format
Standard output format for due diligence analysis reports. Use when producing your final analysis to ensure consistency across all specialist agents.
dd-risk-scoring
Calculate weighted risk scores from specialist agent reports. Use when synthesizing multiple due diligence reports into an overall investment risk assessment.
dd-sourcing
Document sources properly for due diligence reports. Use when citing any external data, ensuring full traceability and auditability of findings.
dd-verification
Verify claims in pitch decks and founder statements using multiple independent sources. Use when analyzing any claim about market size, traction, team background, or competitive positioning.