Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HECer/yoke --skill codebase-designgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HECer/yokeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hecer/yoke/codebase-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hecer/yoke/codebase-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hecer/yoke/codebase-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hecer/yoke/codebase-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hecer/yoke/codebase-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00458 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00183 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00092 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
codebase-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Codebase design
Design deep modules: substantial behavior behind a small interface, placed at a real seam and tested through that interface. Optimize for caller leverage and maintainer locality.
Vocabulary
- Module: anything with one interface and an implementation, from a function to a package.
- Interface: everything a caller must know: types, invariants, ordering, errors, configuration, and relevant performance behavior.
- Implementation: the behavior hidden inside a module.
- Depth: useful behavior per unit of interface a caller must learn.
- Seam: a place where behavior can change without editing the caller at that place.
- Adapter: a concrete implementation that satisfies an interface at a seam.
- Leverage: capability callers gain from a small interface.
- Locality: change, knowledge, bugs, and verification concentrated in one place.
Use these terms consistently. Prefer seam over the overloaded word boundary when discussing replaceable behavior.
Design checks
- Reduce methods and parameters when callers do not need the exposed choice.
- Hide repeated orchestration, invariants, and error handling inside the module.
- Apply the deletion test: deleting a useful module should make its complexity reappear across its callers. A layer whose complexity simply vanishes was probably a pass-through.
- Treat the interface as the test surface. Tests should survive internal refactors.
- Accept dependencies at real seams instead of constructing hard-to-replace externals internally.
- Introduce a seam for demonstrated variation. Production plus a meaningful test adapter can make two real adapters; a single speculative adapter does not.
- Return observable results where practical instead of requiring tests to inspect internal state.
For dependency-specific deepening, read DEEPENING.md. For a consequential interface with several plausible shapes, read DESIGN-IT-TWICE.md.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 552dfb87e896
codebase-design is a skill published in the GitHub repository HECer/yoke (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 458 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
design-explore
Explore 2-4 design options with pros/cons/criteria matrix before writing code. Use for L3-L4 tasks (refactors, architecture, new subsystems). Pairs with savedecision MCP tool.
ox-cli-viz
Choose review-friendly visual explanations with ox viz. Use when creating or updating a PR description, especially for architecture, lifecycle, data flow, before/after, or multi-component changes; also use for plans, docs, reports, and design notes. Start a material PR description with ox viz pr; ask a known reviewer…
onboarding-flow
When the user needs to design, improve, or audit a post-signup activation flow to get new users to their first value moment. Activate when activation is lagging, time-to-value feels excessive, or first sessions lack impact.
impeccable
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states.…
landing-page
When the user needs to create, critique, or optimize a landing page for conversion -- including headline rewrites, CTA placement, layout restructuring, or full page copy drafts.
user-research-synthesis
When the user has raw customer interview transcripts, survey responses, support tickets, or other qualitative data and needs to extract actionable insights.