Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/helderberto/agent-skills/shipnpx skills add helderberto/agent-skills --skill shipgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/helderberto/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/helderberto/agent-skills/ship)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/helderberto/agent-skills/ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/helderberto/agent-skills/ship.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00552 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00276 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
ship scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Ship Changes
Ship runs a pre-launch gate before committing. By default: validate-code + safe-repo. The gate ensures nothing broken or unsafe leaves the working tree.
Arguments
--fast— skip the pre-launch gate. Only for hotfixes, disposable branches (spike/prototype/CI), or when the gate already passed manually this session. Never on main/release. State the reason in the commit body.
Workflow
Phase 1 — Pre-launch gate (skipped if --fast)
- Validate code: invoke the validate-code skill. Auto-fixes formatting, verifies types, runs tests.
- If
validate-codereturns FAIL → report errors, STOP. Do not commit or push.
- If
- Sensitive data scan: invoke the safe-repo skill against the staged + unstaged diff only (not the whole repo).
- If sensitive data found → report findings, STOP. Do not commit or push.
Phase 2 — Commit
- Review all changes from status and diff
- Analyze recent commit style from log
- Group changed files by logical concern using commit grouping rules
- For each group: stage specific files by name, commit with HEREDOC format
- If all changes form one logical unit, stage files by name (never
git add -Aorgit add .)
Phase 3 — Push
- Push:
git push(current branch) - Run
git statusafter to verify
Rules
- Pre-launch gate runs by default; only skip via
--fastwith a stated reason; never--faston main/release branches - Group changes into atomic commits when they serve distinct purposes
- NEVER force push (
-for--force)
Error Handling
- If
git pushis rejected (non-fast-forward) → rungit pull --rebasethen retry push once - If pre-commit hook fails → fix reported issues, re-stage, create a NEW commit (never
--amend) - If
--fastis used → log "Pre-launch gate skipped via --fast" in agent output for traceability
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 49 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 277071ebb8e2
ship is a skill published in the GitHub repository helderberto/agent-skills (14 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 552 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
release
Curate a release for the Claude Manager extension — analyze git commits since last tag, categorize them, generate a release notes markdown file in docs/releases/, decide the correct version bump, update CHANGELOG.md, and push a commit that triggers the CI/CD workflow to publish.
hcom-agent-messaging
Multi-agent communication for AI coding tools. Agents message, watch, and spawn each other across terminals. Use when setting up hcom, troubleshooting delivery, or writing multi-agent scripts.
env-scanner
Scan and audit Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Antigravity, Continue, Windsurf, JetBrains AI, and OpenCode environments. Discovers configurations, audits memory tiers, detects skill extraction state, analyzes behavioral tool chains, checks policy governance (v0.40+), and suggests reusable skills with evidence gating.…
scan
Scan your AI coding tool ecosystem — Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Antigravity (Desktop, CLI, IDE), Continue, Windsurf, JetBrains AI, OpenCode. Produces a maturity score, advisory recommendations, and optionally generates reusable SKILL.md files from your conversation patterns. Use when the user asks to audit their…
make-decision
AI-powered decision-making framework: 10+ methodologies, cognitive bias detection, strategic planning, career & business decisions. Use when user says "decide", "choose", "compare", "which one", "should I", "weigh options", "trade-off", "pros and cons", "help me pick", "evaluate", "select", "prioritize", "nên chọn cái…
problem-solving-pro
Systematic problem-solving toolkit: root cause analysis, hypothesis testing, debugging strategies, critical thinking frameworks. Use when user says "solve", "analyze", "diagnose", "debug", "figure out", "what's wrong", "root cause", "why is this happening", "I'm stuck", "break down", "decompose", "structure", "tại sao…