speckit-clarify

speckit-clarify is a skill for Claude Code from HelixDevelopment/code. It costs 34 tokens per session (4,148 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of speckit-clarify, MIT.

A clarification workflow that finds unclear parts of an existing feature specification and asks up to five focused questions. The answers are written back into the specification.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to resolve ambiguous requirements and make a feature specification more complete.
Why use it?
It exposes missing decisions before planning or coding, reducing the chance of building the wrong behavior.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution.

Good fit Use it to resolve ambiguous requirements and make a feature specification more complete.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/helixdevelopment/code/speckit-clarify
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add HelixDevelopment/code --skill speckit-clarify
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HelixDevelopment/code

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for speckit-clarify

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/helixdevelopment/code/speckit-clarify/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/helixdevelopment/code/speckit-clarify)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/helixdevelopment/code/speckit-clarify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/helixdevelopment/code/speckit-clarify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for speckit-clarify

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/helixdevelopment/code/speckit-clarify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/helixdevelopment/code/speckit-clarify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 34 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,148 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 91% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00034 $0.04148
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.01659
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00830
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00415

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 86fc6d058206, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

speckit-clarify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

91% identical to speckit-clarify — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.kimi-code/skills/speckit-clarify/SKILL.md · 292 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 292 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

User Input

$ARGUMENTS

You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).

Pre-Execution Checks

Check for extension hooks (before clarification):

  • Check if .specify/extensions.yml exists in the project root.
  • If it exists, read it and look for entries under the hooks.before_clarify key
  • If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
  • Filter out hooks where enabled is explicitly false. Treat hooks without an enabled field as enabled by default.
  • For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook condition expressions:
    • If the hook has no condition field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
    • If the hook defines a non-empty condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
  • When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (.) with hyphens (-). For example, speckit.git.commit → /skill:speckit-git-commit.
  • For each executable hook, output the following based on its optional flag:
    • Optional hook (optional: true):
      ## Extension Hooks
      
      **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
      Command: `/{command}`
      Description: {description}
      
      Prompt: {prompt}
      To execute: `/{command}`
      
    • Mandatory hook (optional: false):
      ## Extension Hooks
      
      **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
      Executing: `/{command}`
      EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
      
      Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
      
      After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal {command} id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as /skill:speckit-... or $speckit-...). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
  • If no hooks are registered or .specify/extensions.yml does not exist, skip silently

Read the full file on GitHub · 292 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 292 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 86fc6d058206

Subscribe to this mod's changes

speckit-clarify is a skill published in the GitHub repository HelixDevelopment/code (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 4,148 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to speckit-clarify, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

hqe

Comprehensive codebase health auditing, remediation, and verification skill based on the canonical HQE Protocol v5.0.0.

spearchucker667/Skill-HQE · 29 tokens

kirocrew-app-dev

Build, package, and publish Kiro Crew external apps. Covers app.json manifests, UI components, crons, skills, lifecycle hooks, development mode, registry publishing, and common pitfalls.

kirodotdev/KiroCrew · 44 tokens

goal-conductor

Own a goal too large for one session ('clear the flaky-test backlog', 'push N PRs green') end to end via the work ledger — decompose into items, one session per item, read worker status as data, verify claims with the acceptance evaluator, decide each round until done. Use when handed such a goal.

kirodotdev/KiroCrew · 70 tokens

cost-efficiency-analyzer

Analyzes cost structure, cost efficiency, and expense management from P&L data. Use when the user asks about costs, expenses, COGS, operating expenses, cost ratios, cost control, spending efficiency, margin compression from cost side, or wants to understand where money is going. Also use for "are we spending too…

awslabs/agentcore-samples · 98 tokens

security-conductor

Operating procedure for the kirocrew-security-conductor agent. Use when a security conductor session is seeded, inspected or debugged. Run vulnerability discovery on one target as a supervised fleet — one auditor per attack surface, an independent verifier per finding, two human gates.

kirodotdev/KiroCrew · 57 tokens

computer-use

Read and drive native desktop apps through the accessibility layer — list apps, snapshot a window as a numbered element tree, then click/type/scroll/drag by element index or screen coordinates. Use for a desktop app, not a web page. macOS + Windows; off unless enabled in Settings.

kirodotdev/KiroCrew · 62 tokens