Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/helmedeiros/clean-code-skills/refactor-replace-conditional-with-polymorphismnpx skills add helmedeiros/clean-code-skills --skill refactor-replace-conditional-with-polymorphismgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/helmedeiros/clean-code-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/helmedeiros/clean-code-skills/refactor-replace-conditional-with-polymorphism)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/helmedeiros/clean-code-skills/refactor-replace-conditional-with-polymorphism"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/helmedeiros/clean-code-skills/refactor-replace-conditional-with-polymorphism.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00061 | $0.00820 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00410 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00164 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
refactor-replace-conditional-with-polymorphism scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Refactoring: Replace Conditional with Polymorphism
Replace complex conditional logic that branches on type or category with polymorphic dispatch, distributing each branch into its own class with a shared interface.
When This Skill Applies
- A switch or if-else chain branches on an object's type, status, or category
- The same conditional structure is duplicated across multiple methods
- Adding a new type requires modifying existing conditionals
- The user wants to apply the Open-Closed Principle to branching logic
- Business rules vary by type and are tangled together
Core Principle
When a conditional selects behavior based on type, replace the conditional with polymorphism. Each type gets its own class that implements a shared interface. The conditional disappears — the correct behavior is selected by the object's type at runtime. This makes the system open for extension (add a new type) and closed for modification (existing types are untouched).
Workflow
Step 1: Identify the Conditional
Find switch statements or if-else chains that branch on type, status, category, or kind. Look for the same branching pattern repeated in multiple methods — this is a strong signal.
Step 2: Define the Interface
Extract the common method signature from the conditional branches. This becomes the shared interface or abstract method that all variants will implement.
Step 3: Create Subclasses or Implementations
For each branch, create a class that implements the interface. Move the branch's logic into the corresponding class. Each class encapsulates the behavior for one variant.
Step 4: Replace the Conditional with Dispatch
Replace the original conditional with a call to the interface method on the appropriate object. Use a factory or registry to select the correct implementation at construction time.
Step 5: Verify
Run the test suite. Add a test for each variant to confirm the polymorphic behavior matches the original conditional logic.
Detection / Indicators
- Switch statements with more than 3 cases
- If-else chains with
instanceof, type checks, or string comparisons - The same switch structure appears in multiple methods
- Adding a new type requires editing multiple files
- Comments like "if it's a Premium user, do X; if Basic, do Y"
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 92 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A db8a874d8d4e
refactor-replace-conditional-with-polymorphism is a skill published in the GitHub repository helmedeiros/clean-code-skills (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 820 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
fp-brief
First-principles briefing from technical documents. Use when: understanding why decisions were made, onboarding to feature reasoning, reviewing decision chains, explaining doc from first principles. Not for: PM/CTO summary (use project-brief), pre-doc analysis (use feasibility-study), code explanation (use…
codex-explain
Explain complex code via Codex MCP. Use when: understanding complex logic, tracing data flow, onboarding to unfamiliar code. Not for: code review (use codex-code-review), exploration (use code-explore). Output: structured explanation at chosen depth.
sharingan
Replicate knowledge from any source as sd0x-dev-flow skill definition. Use when: copying skills from repos, adapting patterns from articles/papers/code, converting knowledge to skill format. Not for: research without skill output (use deep-research), creating skills from scratch (use skill-creator), project onboarding…
creating-explainers
Use when creating an interactive explainer - a single self-contained HTML page with hand-built Canvas figures. Handles source-file explainers, topic-driven research explainers, and mixed intake where files provide the spine and research adds support. Trigger phrases include "make an explainer", "turn this paper into…
explaining-codebases
Use when creating an interactive explainer about a codebase, repository, or source files. Handles onboarding overviews, architecture maps, and deep-dives on real implementation paths. Trigger phrases include "explain this codebase", "interactive guide to this repo", "walk through how X works in the code", or…
openehr-assistant
This skill should be used when a conversation touches openEHR outside a task owned by a dedicated skill — e.g. "what is an archetype?", "how do openEHR templates work?", "which composition category fits this data?", "find me a guide on X", "where do I start with openEHR modeling?" — or names openEHR concepts (ADL…