Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/api-auth-patternsnpx skills add HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-Code --skill api-auth-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-CodeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02405 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01203 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00481 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00241 |
Grade A, and why
api-auth-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 223 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
API Authentication Patterns
Secure authentication and authorization implementation patterns for APIs, covering OAuth 2.0, JWT, API keys, mTLS, and session management.
Knowledge Base
OAuth 2.0 Flows
Authorization Code with PKCE (Recommended for most applications)
The most secure flow for applications that interact with users. PKCE (Proof Key for Code Exchange, RFC 7636) prevents authorization code interception attacks and is required for public clients and recommended for all clients.
Flow:
- Client generates random
code_verifier(43-128 characters, unreserved URI characters) - Client computes
code_challenge = BASE64URL(SHA256(code_verifier)) - Client redirects user to authorization endpoint with
code_challengeandcode_challenge_method=S256 - User authenticates and consents
- Authorization server redirects back with
code - Client exchanges
code+code_verifierat token endpoint - Authorization server verifies
SHA256(code_verifier) == code_challengeand issues tokens
Security requirements:
- State parameter: Cryptographically random, bound to user session, verified on callback
- Redirect URI: Exact match validation (no wildcards, no path traversal)
- PKCE: S256 method only (plain method provides no security)
- Token endpoint: Authenticated with client_secret (confidential clients) or PKCE only (public clients)
Client Credentials (Machine-to-machine)
For service-to-service communication where no user is involved.
Security requirements:
- Client secrets rotated regularly and stored securely (not in code)
- Scope limited to minimum required permissions
- Short token lifetimes (5-15 minutes)
- mTLS client certificate binding for high-security environments
JWT Best Practices
Token Structure and Signing:
// Header
{
"alg": "RS256", // Use asymmetric algorithms for distributed validation
"typ": "JWT",
"kid": "key-2024-01" // Key ID for rotation support
}
// Payload
{
"iss": "https://auth.example.com", // Issuer - validate this
"sub": "user-uuid-here", // Subject - the user identifier
"aud": "https://api.example.com", // Audience - validate this
"exp": 1700000000, // Expiration - short-lived (15-60 min)
"nbf": 1699999000, // Not before
"iat": 1699999000, // Issued at
"jti": "unique-token-id", // JWT ID - for revocation tracking
"scope": "read:users write:orders" // Scopes/permissions
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 223 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A dbbac13a956c
api-auth-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-Code (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,405 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
implementing-devsecops-security-scanning
Integrates Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) into CI/CD pipelines using open-source tools. Covers Semgrep for SAST, Trivy for SCA and container scanning, OWASP ZAP for DAST, and Gitleaks for secrets detection. Activates for…
implementing-runtime-application-self-protection
Deploy Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) agents to detect and block attacks from within application runtime, covering OpenRASP integration, attack pattern detection, and security policy configuration for Java and Python web applications.
building-devsecops-pipeline-with-gitlab-ci
Design and implement a comprehensive DevSecOps pipeline in GitLab CI/CD integrating SAST, DAST, container scanning, dependency scanning, and secret detection.
audit-production-readiness
Audit a repository or service for release-blocking bugs, security, data/privacy, AI-agent, supply-chain, operability, and scale risks. Use for deep code audits, threat models, pre-production reviews, vulnerability triage, incidents, defensive investigation, release gates, or evidence-based 10k-to-1M-user readiness.
engineer-production-systems
Design, write, refactor, or optimize production code so it is secure, correct, resource-bounded, observable, and maintainable. Use for full-stack features, APIs, databases, AI/RAG/MCP tools, CPU/RAM/latency work, 10k-to-1M-user planning, or authorized kernel, browser, parser, protocol, and defensive…
best-in-code
Run an adaptive, reusable software-delivery harness across AI models with project management, planning, research, design, frontend, backend, QA, durable scoped memory, capability fallbacks, bounded discovery, and human approval gates. Use when the user invokes Harness or asks for an end-to-end build, review, bug…