Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-Code --skill ir-playbooksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-CodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/ir-playbooks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/ir-playbooks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/ir-playbooks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/ir-playbooks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/ir-playbooks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.03168 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.01267 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00634 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00317 |
Grade A, and why
ir-playbooks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 283 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Incident Response Playbooks
Playbook templates for common security incident types, providing step-by-step response procedures for each phase of incident handling.
Knowledge Base
Playbook Structure
Every playbook follows the same four-phase structure from NIST SP 800-61:
- Detection & Validation -- Confirm the incident is real, classify it
- Containment -- Stop the spread, limit damage
- Eradication & Recovery -- Remove the threat, restore operations
- Post-Incident -- Document, learn, improve
Playbook 1: Malware Infection
Indicators:
- Antivirus/EDR alert on malicious file or behavior
- Unusual process execution (PowerShell encoding, living-off-the-land binaries)
- Unexpected network connections to known bad IPs/domains
- System performance degradation, unexpected file encryption
- User reports of unusual system behavior
Detection & Validation:
- Verify the alert is not a false positive (check file hash against VirusTotal, check process lineage)
- Identify the malware type: dropper, RAT, ransomware, cryptominer, wiper, worm
- Determine the infection vector: email attachment, drive-by download, USB, lateral movement
- Assess scope: single system or multiple systems?
- Check for lateral movement indicators (SMB connections, RDP sessions, credential dumping artifacts)
Containment:
- Immediate: Isolate the infected system from the network (disable network adapter or move to quarantine VLAN). Do NOT power off -- preserve memory evidence.
- Collect volatile evidence: memory dump, process list, network connections, logged-in sessions
- Block known IOCs at network perimeter (firewall rules for C2 IPs/domains)
- Block file hashes in EDR/antivirus across the organization
- Identify and isolate other potentially infected systems
- Disable affected user accounts if credential compromise is suspected
- Block lateral movement: disable admin shares, restrict RDP, enable enhanced authentication logging
Eradication & Recovery:
- Identify and remove all malware artifacts: files, registry keys, scheduled tasks, services, startup items
- If rootkit suspected, reimage from known-good media rather than attempting cleanup
- Reset credentials for all accounts that were active on compromised systems
- Patch the vulnerability that allowed initial infection
- Restore data from clean backups if needed (verify backup integrity first)
- Rebuild or reimage affected systems from gold images
- Monitor recovered systems closely for 30 days
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago Changed · +5 lines · +62 tokens per session 849b950cadcc
- 1mo ago First seen · 278 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 20584aba535a
ir-playbooks is a skill published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-Code (4 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 3,168 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
implementing-devsecops-security-scanning
Integrates Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) into CI/CD pipelines using open-source tools. Covers Semgrep for SAST, Trivy for SCA and container scanning, OWASP ZAP for DAST, and Gitleaks for secrets detection. Activates for…
building-devsecops-pipeline-with-gitlab-ci
Design and implement a comprehensive DevSecOps pipeline in GitLab CI/CD integrating SAST, DAST, container scanning, dependency scanning, and secret detection.
integrating-dast-with-owasp-zap-in-pipeline
This skill covers integrating OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) for Dynamic Application Security Testing in CI/CD pipelines. It addresses configuring baseline, full, and API scans against running applications, interpreting ZAP findings, tuning scan policies, and establishing DAST quality gates in GitHub Actions and GitLab…
implementing-runtime-application-self-protection
Deploy Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) agents to detect and block attacks from within application runtime, covering OpenRASP integration, attack pattern detection, and security policy configuration for Java and Python web applications.
integrating-dast-with-owasp-zap-in-pipeline
This skill covers integrating OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) for Dynamic Application Security Testing in CI/CD pipelines. It addresses configuring baseline, full, and API scans against running applications, interpreting ZAP findings, tuning scan policies, and establishing DAST quality gates in GitHub Actions and GitLab…
audit-production-readiness
Audit a repository or service for release-blocking bugs, security, data/privacy, AI-agent, supply-chain, operability, and scale risks. Use for deep code audits, threat models, pre-production reviews, vulnerability triage, incidents, defensive investigation, release gates, or evidence-based 10k-to-1M-user readiness.