Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-Code --skill k8s-security-policiesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-CodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/k8s-security-policies)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/k8s-security-policies"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/k8s-security-policies/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/k8s-security-policies"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/k8s-security-policies.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.02429 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00972 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00486 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00243 |
Grade A, and why
k8s-security-policies scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 321 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
K8s Security Policies
Pod Security Standards, NetworkPolicy patterns, admission control strategies, and workload security enforcement.
Knowledge Base
Pod Security Standards (PSS) -- The Three Profiles
Pod Security Standards define three progressively restrictive security profiles. These are not policies themselves -- they are standards that admission controllers enforce.
| Profile | Purpose | Restrictions |
|---|---|---|
| Privileged | Unrestricted. For system-level workloads. | None. Everything allowed. |
| Baseline | Prevents known privilege escalations. Minimally restrictive. | No privileged containers, no hostPath, no hostNetwork/PID/IPC, restricted capabilities, restricted volume types, no host ports |
| Restricted | Heavily restricted. Best practice for untrusted workloads. | Baseline + must run as non-root, must drop ALL capabilities (may add NET_BIND_SERVICE), seccomp profile required, restricted seccomp/AppArmor profiles |
Pod Security Admission (PSA) Controller
PSA is the built-in admission controller that enforces PSS. Three modes per namespace:
| Mode | Behavior |
|---|---|
enforce |
Violations are rejected. Pod will not be created. |
audit |
Violations are recorded in audit log but pod is created. |
warn |
Violations generate a warning to the user but pod is created. |
Best practice: Start with audit + warn, fix violations, then switch to enforce.
# Namespace labels for PSA
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
name: production
labels:
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: restricted
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-version: latest
pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: restricted
pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit-version: latest
pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: restricted
pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn-version: latest
NetworkPolicy Fundamentals
NetworkPolicy is Kubernetes' built-in network segmentation. Key behaviors:
- Without any NetworkPolicy, all pods can communicate with all other pods (cluster-wide flat network).
- Once any NetworkPolicy selects a pod (via
podSelector), that pod's traffic is restricted to what the policies explicitly allow. - NetworkPolicies are additive -- multiple policies selecting the same pod combine their allowed traffic.
- NetworkPolicies are namespace-scoped but can reference other namespaces via
namespaceSelector. - Egress policies are often forgotten -- even with ingress restrictions, a compromised pod can phone home without egress controls.
- DNS egress must be explicitly allowed when using egress policies (UDP port 53 to kube-dns).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago Changed · +5 lines · +52 tokens per session 3ec96e33e7ca
- 1mo ago First seen · 316 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 6ec598db665b
k8s-security-policies is a skill published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-Code (4 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 2,429 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
implementing-devsecops-security-scanning
Integrates Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) into CI/CD pipelines using open-source tools. Covers Semgrep for SAST, Trivy for SCA and container scanning, OWASP ZAP for DAST, and Gitleaks for secrets detection. Activates for…
building-devsecops-pipeline-with-gitlab-ci
Design and implement a comprehensive DevSecOps pipeline in GitLab CI/CD integrating SAST, DAST, container scanning, dependency scanning, and secret detection.
integrating-dast-with-owasp-zap-in-pipeline
This skill covers integrating OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) for Dynamic Application Security Testing in CI/CD pipelines. It addresses configuring baseline, full, and API scans against running applications, interpreting ZAP findings, tuning scan policies, and establishing DAST quality gates in GitHub Actions and GitLab…
implementing-runtime-application-self-protection
Deploy Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) agents to detect and block attacks from within application runtime, covering OpenRASP integration, attack pattern detection, and security policy configuration for Java and Python web applications.
integrating-dast-with-owasp-zap-in-pipeline
This skill covers integrating OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) for Dynamic Application Security Testing in CI/CD pipelines. It addresses configuring baseline, full, and API scans against running applications, interpreting ZAP findings, tuning scan policies, and establishing DAST quality gates in GitHub Actions and GitLab…
audit-production-readiness
Audit a repository or service for release-blocking bugs, security, data/privacy, AI-agent, supply-chain, operability, and scale risks. Use for deep code audits, threat models, pre-production reviews, vulnerability triage, incidents, defensive investigation, release gates, or evidence-based 10k-to-1M-user readiness.