Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/memory-forensicsnpx skills add HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-Code --skill memory-forensicsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-CodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/memory-forensics)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/memory-forensics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/memory-forensics.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02943 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01471 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00589 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00294 |
Grade A, and why
memory-forensics scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 320 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Memory Forensics
Volatility framework reference, process analysis, memory artifact types, and RAM analysis patterns for incident response.
Knowledge Base
Why Memory Forensics
Memory forensics reveals evidence that does not exist on disk:
- Running malware: Fileless malware executes entirely in memory. No disk artifact exists.
- Injected code: Malware injected into legitimate processes leaves memory artifacts but may not be visible on disk.
- Decrypted data: Encrypted files are decrypted in memory when accessed. Memory captures may contain plaintext of encrypted data.
- Network connections: Active and recently closed connections exist in kernel memory.
- Credentials: Password hashes, Kerberos tickets, and plaintext passwords reside in LSASS memory and other process spaces.
- Encryption keys: Full-disk encryption keys exist in memory while the volume is mounted.
- Rootkit artifacts: Kernel rootkits that hide from disk-based tools can be detected through memory analysis.
- Process history: Terminated processes may leave residual artifacts in memory until the pages are reused.
Memory Acquisition
Windows:
# WinPMem (Rekall project) -- most reliable
winpmem_mini_x64.exe output.raw
# DumpIt (Comae/Magnet) -- single-click
DumpIt.exe # Outputs to current directory
# FTK Imager -- GUI-based, widely accepted in legal proceedings
# File > Capture Memory > Select output location
Linux:
# LiME (Linux Memory Extractor) -- kernel module
# Must be compiled for the target kernel version
insmod lime.ko "path=/evidence/memory.lime format=lime"
# /proc/kcore (requires root, may not capture all memory)
dd if=/proc/kcore of=/evidence/kcore.raw bs=1M
# AVML (Acquire Volatile Memory for Linux) -- Microsoft, no compilation needed
./avml /evidence/memory.lime
Verification:
# Always hash memory images immediately after acquisition
sha256sum memory.raw > memory.raw.sha256
Volatility 3 Architecture
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 320 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 70c90f054639
memory-forensics is a skill published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-Code (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,943 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
implementing-devsecops-security-scanning
Integrates Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) into CI/CD pipelines using open-source tools. Covers Semgrep for SAST, Trivy for SCA and container scanning, OWASP ZAP for DAST, and Gitleaks for secrets detection. Activates for…
implementing-runtime-application-self-protection
Deploy Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) agents to detect and block attacks from within application runtime, covering OpenRASP integration, attack pattern detection, and security policy configuration for Java and Python web applications.
building-devsecops-pipeline-with-gitlab-ci
Design and implement a comprehensive DevSecOps pipeline in GitLab CI/CD integrating SAST, DAST, container scanning, dependency scanning, and secret detection.
audit-production-readiness
Audit a repository or service for release-blocking bugs, security, data/privacy, AI-agent, supply-chain, operability, and scale risks. Use for deep code audits, threat models, pre-production reviews, vulnerability triage, incidents, defensive investigation, release gates, or evidence-based 10k-to-1M-user readiness.
engineer-production-systems
Design, write, refactor, or optimize production code so it is secure, correct, resource-bounded, observable, and maintainable. Use for full-stack features, APIs, databases, AI/RAG/MCP tools, CPU/RAM/latency work, 10k-to-1M-user planning, or authorized kernel, browser, parser, protocol, and defensive…
best-in-code
Run an adaptive, reusable software-delivery harness across AI models with project management, planning, research, design, frontend, backend, QA, durable scoped memory, capability fallbacks, bounded discovery, and human approval gates. Use when the user invokes Harness or asks for an end-to-end build, review, bug…